The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fluorescent and Affinity-Based Tools To Detect Cysteine Sulfenic Acid Formation in Proteins
Open accessAbstract
Cysteine sulfenic acid formation in proteins results from the oxidative modification of susceptible cysteine residues by hydrogen peroxide, alkyl hydroperoxides, and peroxynitrite. This species represents a biologically significant modification occurring during oxidant signaling or oxidative stress, and it can modulate protein function. Most methods to identify such oxidatively modified proteins rely on monitoring the loss of one or more thiol group(s) or on selective labeling of nascent thiol groups following reduction of oxidized proteins. Our previous work reported the direct labeling of these chemically distinct modifications with a dimedone analogue, 1,3-cyclohexadione, to which a linker and functional group (an alcohol) had been added; further addition of a fluorescent isatoic acid or methoxycoumarin reporter allowed detection of the incorporated tag by fluorescence techniques ( Poole, L. B., Zeng, B. B., Knaggs, S. A., Yakubu, M., and King, S. B. ( 2005) Synthesis of chemical probes to map sulfenic acid modifications on proteins. Bioconjugate Chem . 16, 1624-1628 ). We have now expanded our arsenal of tagging reagents to include two fluorescein-, two rhodamine-, and three biotin-conjugated probes based on the original approach. The new tools provide readily detectable fluorescent and affinity probes to identify sulfenic acid modifications in proteins and have been used in subsequent mass spectrometric analyses to confirm covalent attachment of the conjugates and directly determine the site of modification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chemistry and biology of reactive oxygen species in signaling or stress responses
Dickinson, B. C., & Chang, C. J. (2011) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.607 · Cited by 1,821
Cysteine-Mediated Redox Signaling: Chemistry, Biology, and Tools for Discovery
Paulsen, C. E., & Carroll, K. S. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300163e · Cited by 1,278
Reisz, J. A., Bansal, N., Qian, J., Zhao, W., & Furdui, C. M. (2014) · Antioxidants & Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2013.5489 · Cited by 833
Self-citationSignaling Functions of Reactive Oxygen Species
Forman, H. J., Maiorino, M., & Ursini, F. (2010) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi9020378 · Cited by 827
Orchestrating Redox Signaling Networks through Regulatory Cysteine Switches
Paulsen, C. E., & Carroll, K. S. (2010) · ACS Chemical Biology · doi:10.1021/cb900258z · Cited by 476
Griendling, K. K., Touyz, R. M., Zweier, J. L., Dikalov, S., Chilian, W., Chen, Y.-R., Harrison, D. G., & Bhatnagar, A. (2016) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/res.0000000000000110 · Cited by 444
Sulfenic acid chemistry, detection and cellular lifetime
Gupta, V., & Carroll, K. S. (2014) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects · doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.05.040 · Cited by 427
Redox Signaling by Reactive Electrophiles and Oxidants
Parvez, S., Long, M. J. C., Poganik, J. R., & Aye, Y. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00698 · Cited by 359
Protein sulfenic acid formation: From cellular damage to redox regulation
Roos, G., & Messens, J. (2011) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.04.031 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Poole, L. B., Klomsiri, C., Knaggs, S. A., Furdui, C. M., Nelson, K. J., Thomas, M. J., Fetrow, J. S., Daniel, L. W., & King, S. B.
- Venue
- Bioconjugate Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-11-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2004-2017
- ISSN
- 1043-1802 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4812
- OpenAlex
- W2097341852
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.