Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 828

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

DNA double-crossover molecules

Fu, Tsu Ju, Seeman, Nadrian C.·1993·Biochemistry

Abstract

DNA molecules containing two crossover sites between helical domains have been suggested as intermediates in recombination processes involving double-strand breaks. We have modeled these double-crossover structures in an oligonucleotide system. Whereas the relative orientations of the helical domains must be specified in designing these molecules, there are two broad classes of the molecules, the parallel, DP, and antiparallel, DA, molecules. The distance between crossover points must be specified as multiples of half-turns, in order to avoid torsional stress in this system; hence, there are two further subdivisions, those double-crossover molecules separated by odd, O, and even, E, numbers of half-turns. In addition, the parallel molecules with odd numbers of half-turns between crossovers must be divided into those with an excess major or wide-groove separation, W, or those with an excess minor- or narrow-groove separation, N. We have constructed models of all five of these classes, DAE, DAO, DPE, DPOW, and DPON. DPE molecules containing 1 and 2 helical turns between crossovers have been constructed; the DAE molecule contains 1 turn between crossovers, and the DAO, DPOW, and DPON molecules contain 1.5 helical turns between crossovers. None of the parallel molecules is well-behaved; the molecules either dissociate or form multimers when visualized on native polyacrylamide gels. In contrast, antiparallel molecules form single bands when assayed in this fashion. Hydroxyl radical autofootprinting analysis of these molecules reveals protection at expected sites of crossover and of occlusion, suggesting that all the complexes contain linear helix axes that are roughly coplanar between crossovers. However, the DPOW molecule and the DPE molecule with 2 turns between crossovers show decreased protection in the portion between crossovers, suggesting that their helices may bow in response to charge repulsion. We conclude that the helices between parallel double crossovers must be shielded from each other or distorted from linearity if they are to participate in recombination. We have analyzed the possibilities of branch migration and crossover isomerization in double-crossover molecules. Parallel molecules need no sequence symmetry beyond homology to branch migrate, but the sequence symmetry requirements for antiparallel molecules restrict migration to directly repetitive segments that iterate the sequence between crossovers. Crossover isomerization appears to be a very complex process in parallel double-crossover molecules, suggesting that it may be catalyzed by topoisomerases if it occurs within the cell.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bi00064a003

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 828

Metadata

Authors
Fu, T. J., & Seeman, N. C.
Venue
Biochemistry
Published
1993-04-01
Volume
32
Issue
13
Pages
3211-3220
ISSN
  • 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4995
OpenAlex
W2098818518
Cited by
828
References
0
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA double-crossover molecules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi00064a003
The paper
Fu, T. J., & Seeman, N. C. (1993). DNA double-crossover molecules. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00064a003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.