The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Role of divalent metal ions in the hammerhead RNA cleavage reaction
Abstract
A hammerhead self-cleaving domain composed of two oligoribonucleotides was used to study the role of divalent metal ions in the cleavage reaction. Cleavage rates were measured as a function of MgCl2, MnCl2, and CaCl2 concentration in the absence or presence of spermine. In the presence of spermine, the rate vs metal ion concentration curves are broader, and lower concentrations of divalent ions are necessary for catalytic activity. This suggests that spermine can promote proper folding of the hammerhead and one or more divalent ions are required for the reaction. Six additional divalent ions were tested for their ability to support hammerhead cleavage. In the absence of spermine, rapid cleavage was observed with Co2+ while very slow cleavage occurred with Sr2+ and Ba2+. No detectable specific cleavage was observed with Cd2+, Zn2+, or Pb2+. However, in the presence of 0.5 mM spermine, rapid cleavage was observed with Zn2+ and Cd2+, and the rate with Sr2+ was increased, indicating that while these three ions could not promote proper folding of the hammerhead they were able to stimulate cleavage. These results suggest certain divalent ions either participate directly in the cleavage mechanism or are specifically involved in stabilizing the tertiary structure of the hammerhead. Additionally, an altered divalent metal ion specificity was observed when a unique phosphorothioate linkage was inserted at the cleavage site. The substitution of a sulfur for a nonbridging oxygen atom substantially reduced the affinity of an important Mg2+ ion necessary for efficient cleavage. In contrast, the reaction proceeds normally with Mn2+, presumably due to its ability to coordinate with both oxygen and sulfur.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A DNA enzyme with Mg2+-dependent RNA phosphoesterase activity
Breaker, R. R., & Joyce, G. F. (1995) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/1074-5521(95)90028-4 · Cited by 420
Noodleman, L., Lovell, T., Han, W.-G., Li, J., & Himo, F. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020625a · Cited by 373
MECHANISTIC ASPECTS OF ENZYMATIC CATALYSIS: Lessons from Comparison of RNA and Protein Enzymes
Narlikar, G. J., & Herschlag, D. (1997) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.19 · Cited by 262
Landree, M. A., Wibbenmeyer, J. A., & Roth, D. B. (1999) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.13.23.3059 · Cited by 209
Ribozyme Structures and Mechanisms
Doherty, E. A., & Doudna, J. A. (2001) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.30.1.457 · Cited by 195
Metadata
- Authors
- Dahm, S. C., & Uhlenbeck, O. C.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1991-10-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 39
- Pages
- 9464-9469
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2078224461
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of divalent metal ions in the hammerhead RNA cleavage reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi00103a011
- The paper
- Dahm, S. C., & Uhlenbeck, O. C. (1991). Role of divalent metal ions in the hammerhead RNA cleavage reaction. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00103a011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.