MECHANISTIC ASPECTS OF ENZYMATIC CATALYSIS: Lessons from Comparison of RNA and Protein Enzymes
Abstract
A classic approach in biology, both organismal and cellular, is to compare morphologies in order to glean structural and functional commonalities. The comparative approach has also proven valuable on a molecular level. For example, phylogenetic comparisons of RNA sequences have led to determination of conserved secondary and even tertiary structures, and comparisons of protein structures have led to classifications of families of protein folds. Here we take this approach in a mechanistic direction, comparing protein and RNA enzymes. The aim of comparing RNA and protein enzymes is to learn about fundamental physical and chemical principles of biological catalysis. The more recently discovered RNA enzymes, or ribozymes, provide a distinct perspective on long-standing questions of biological catalysis. The differences described in this review have taught us about the aspects of RNA and proteins that are distinct, whereas the common features have helped us to understand the aspects that are fundamental to biological catalysis. This has allowed the framework that was put forth by Jencks for protein catalysts over 20 years ago ( 1 ) to be extended to RNA enzymes, generalized, and strengthened.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
All of these tasks might be performed by RNA, acting either alone or with the help of a suitably positioned metal cation or other cofactor.
“All of these tasks might be performed by RNA (Narlikar and Herschlag 1997;Emilsson et al. 2003), acting either alone (Strobel and Ortoleva-Donnelly 1999) or with the help of a suitably positioned metal cation or other cofactor (Shan et al. 1999(Shan et al. , 2001)).”
From Protocells and RNA Self-Replication (2018) · cites this paper as Narlikar and Herschlag 1997
Cites
The RNA moiety of ribonuclease P is the catalytic subunit of the enzyme
Guerrier-Takada, C., Gardiner, K., Marsh, T., Pace, N., & Altman, S. (1983) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(83)90117-4 · Cited by 2,684 · see citing works
Isolation of New Ribozymes from a Large Pool of Random Sequences
Bartel, D. P., & Szostak, J. W. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7690155 · Cited by 900 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The chemical repertoire of natural ribozymes
Doudna, J. A., & Cech, T. R. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/418222a · Cited by 745 · see citing works
Plant diversity enhances ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 and nitrogen deposition
Reich, P. B., Knops, J., Tilman, D., Craine, J., Ellsworth, D., Tjoelker, M., Lee, T., Wedin, D., Naeem, S., Bahauddin, D., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35071062 · Cited by 609 · see citing works
Robertson, M. P., & Joyce, G. F. (2012) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a003608 · Cited by 556 · see citing works
The catalytic diversity of RNAs
Fedor, M. J., & Williamson, J. R. (2005) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1647 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Protocells and RNA Self-Replication
Joyce, G. F., & Szostak, J. W. (2018) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a034801 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Muth, G. W., Ortoleva-Donnelly, L., & Strobel, S. A. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.289.5481.947 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Müller, U. F. (2006) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-006-6047-1 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
- Authors
- Narlikar, G. J., & Herschlag, D.
- Affiliations
- Department of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-5307
- Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-5307
- Venue
- Annual Review of Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-59
- ISSN
- 0066-4154
- 1545-4509
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review