Cited by 226

MECHANISTIC ASPECTS OF ENZYMATIC CATALYSIS: Lessons from Comparison of RNA and Protein Enzymes

Narlikar, Geeta J., Herschlag, Daniel·1997·Annual Review of Biochemistry

Abstract

A classic approach in biology, both organismal and cellular, is to compare morphologies in order to glean structural and functional commonalities. The comparative approach has also proven valuable on a molecular level. For example, phylogenetic comparisons of RNA sequences have led to determination of conserved secondary and even tertiary structures, and comparisons of protein structures have led to classifications of families of protein folds. Here we take this approach in a mechanistic direction, comparing protein and RNA enzymes. The aim of comparing RNA and protein enzymes is to learn about fundamental physical and chemical principles of biological catalysis. The more recently discovered RNA enzymes, or ribozymes, provide a distinct perspective on long-standing questions of biological catalysis. The differences described in this review have taught us about the aspects of RNA and proteins that are distinct, whereas the common features have helped us to understand the aspects that are fundamental to biological catalysis. This has allowed the framework that was put forth by Jencks for protein catalysts over 20 years ago ( 1 ) to be extended to RNA enzymes, generalized, and strengthened.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.19

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All of these tasks might be performed by RNA, acting either alone or with the help of a suitably positioned metal cation or other cofactor.

    “All of these tasks might be performed by RNA (Narlikar and Herschlag 1997;Emilsson et al. 2003), acting either alone (Strobel and Ortoleva-Donnelly 1999) or with the help of a suitably positioned metal cation or other cofactor (Shan et al. 1999(Shan et al. , 2001)).”

    From Protocells and RNA Self-Replication (2018) · cites this paper as Narlikar and Herschlag 1997

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Narlikar, G. J., & Herschlag, D.
Affiliations
  • Department of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-5307
  • Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-5307
Venue
Annual Review of Biochemistry
Published
1997-06
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
19-59
ISSN
  • 0066-4154
  • 1545-4509
Cited by
226
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review