The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A novel sensitive and specific assay for abasic sites, the most commonly produced DNA lesion
Abstract
Free radicals produce a wide spectrum of damages; among these are DNA base damages and abasic (AP) sites. Although several methods have been used to detect and quantify AP sites, they either are relatively laborious or require the use of radioactivity. A novel reagent for detecting abasic sites in DNA was prepared by reacting O-(carboxymethyl)hydroxylamine with biotin hydrazide in the presence of carbodiimide. This reagent, called Aldehyde Reactive Probe (ARP), specifically tagged AP sites in DNA with biotin residues. The number of biotin-tagged AP sites was then determined colorimetrically by an ELISA-like assay using avidin/biotin complex conjugated to horseradish peroxidase as the indicator enzyme. With heat/acid-depurinated calf thymus or bacteriophage f1 DNA, ARP detected femtomoles of AP sites in DNA. Using this assay, DNA damages generated in calf thymus, phi X174 RF, and f1 single-stranded DNA, X-irradiated in phosphate buffer, were easily detectable at 10 rad (0.1 Gy). Furthermore, ARP sites were detectable in DNA isolated from heat-inactivated X-irradiated (10 Gy) and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS)-treated (5 microM) Escherichia coli cells. The rate of production of ARP sites was proportional to the X-ray dose as well as to the concentration of MMS. Thus, the sensitivity and simplicity of the ARP assay should provide a potentially powerful method for the quantitation of AP sites or other DNA lesions containing an aldehyde group.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Someya, S., Yu, W., Hallows, W. C., Xu, J., Vann, J. M., Leeuwenburgh, C., Tanokura, M., Denu, J. M., & Prolla, T. A. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.10.002 · Cited by 1,150
Protein carbonylation as a major hallmark of oxidative damage: Update of analytical strategies
Fedorova, M., Bollineni, R. C., & Hoffmann, R. (2014) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.21381 · Cited by 516
The genomics of oxidative DNA damage, repair, and resulting mutagenesis
Poetsch, A. R. (2020) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2019.12.013 · Cited by 420
Poetsch, A. R., Boulton, S. J., & Luscombe, N. M. (2018) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1582-2 · Cited by 132
Small-molecule activation of OGG1 increases oxidative DNA damage repair by gaining a new function
Michel, M., Benítez-Buelga, C., Calvo, P. A., Hanna, B. M. F., Mortusewicz, O., Masuyer, G., Davies, J., Wallner, O., Sanjiv, K., Albers, J. J., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abf8980 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Kubo, K., Ide, H., Wallace, S. S., & Kow, Y. W.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1992-04-14
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 3703-3708
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W1990495935
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A novel sensitive and specific assay for abasic sites, the most commonly produced DNA lesion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi00129a020
- The paper
- Kubo, K., Ide, H., Wallace, S. S., & Kow, Y. W. (1992). A novel sensitive and specific assay for abasic sites, the most commonly produced DNA lesion. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00129a020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.