The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Specific Nucleus as the Transition State for Protein Folding: Evidence from the Lattice Model
Abstract
We have studied the folding mechanism of lattice model 36-mer proteins. Using a simulated annealing procedure in sequence space, we have designed sequences to have sufficiently low energy in a given target conformation, which plays the role of the native structure in our study. The sequence design algorithm generated sequences for which the native structures is a pronounced global energy minimum. Then, designed sequences were subjected to lattice Monte Carlo simulations of folding. In each run, starting from a random coil conformation, the chain reached its native structure, which is indicative that the model proteins solve the Levinthal paradox. The folding mechanism involved nucleation growth. Formation of a specific nucleus, which is a particular pattern of contacts, is shown to be a necessary and sufficient condition for subsequent rapid folding to the native state. The nucleus represents a transition state of folding to the molten globule conformation. The search for the nucleus is a rate-limiting step of folding and corresponds to overcoming the major free energy barrier. We also observed a folding pathway that is the approach to the native state after nucleus formation; this stage takes about 1% of the simulation time. The nucleus is a spatially localized substructure of the native state having 8 out of 40 native contacts. However, monomers belonging to the nucleus are scattered along the sequence, so that several nucleus contacts are long-range while other are short-range. A folding nucleus was also found in a longer chain 80-mer, where it also constituted 20% of the native structure. The possible mechanism of folding of designed proteins, as well as the experimental implications of this study is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699114 · Cited by 37,192
Cited by
From Levinthal to pathways to funnels
Dill, K. A., & Chan, H. S. (1997) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb0197-10 · Cited by 2,293
THEORY OF PROTEIN FOLDING: The Energy Landscape Perspective
Onuchic, J. N., Luthey-Schulten, Z., & Wolynes, P. G. (1997) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.48.1.545 · Cited by 2,210
Nucleation mechanisms in protein folding
Fersht, A. R. (1997) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/s0959-440x(97)80002-4 · Cited by 545
Toward an outline of the topography of a realistic protein-folding funnel.
Onuchic, J. N., Wolynes, P. G., Luthey-Schulten, Z., & Socci, N. D. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.8.3626 · Cited by 523
Protein folding in the landscape perspective: Chevron plots and non-arrhenius kinetics
Chan, H. S., & Dill, K. A. (1998) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(19980101)30:1<2::aid-prot2>3.0.co;2-r · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- Abkevich, V. I., Gutin, A. M., & Shakhnovich, E. I.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1994-08-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 33
- Pages
- 10026-10036
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2016019576
- Cited by
- 470
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Specific Nucleus as the Transition State for Protein Folding: Evidence from the Lattice Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi00199a029
- The paper
- Abkevich, V. I., Gutin, A. M., & Shakhnovich, E. I. (1994). Specific Nucleus as the Transition State for Protein Folding: Evidence from the Lattice Model. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00199a029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.