Cited by 168Protein Tyrosine PhosphatasesProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingSignaling Pathways in Disease

Molecular cloning of cDNAs encoding two isoforms of the catalytic subunit of protein phosphatase 2A

Stone, Stuart R., Hofsteenge, Jan, Hemmings, Brian A.·1987·Biochemistry

Abstract

Clones coding for the catalytic subunit of one of the major protein phosphatases (type 2A) were isolated from a porcine cDNA library. Sequence analysis indicated that two different mRNA species coded for this enzyme. The deduced amino acid sequences of the two forms (alpha and beta) of the enzyme were 98% identical and showed 95% identity with the partial sequence of the rabbit enzyme determined by amino acid sequencing. The use of specific oligonucleotide probes indicated that the mRNAs coding for the alpha and beta forms were about 2 kilobases in length, present in equal amounts in a porcine cell line (LLC-PK1), and were the products of two distinct genes. Southern analysis using the coding region of the alpha phosphatase cDNA as a probe suggested the existence of additional related phosphatase genes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bi00397a003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PP2A/Cα and PP2A/Cβ share about 98% sequence identity, with the N-terminus being the most variable region.

    “The two isoforms share approximately 98% sequence identity, with the most variable region being the N-terminus (Stone et al., 1987).”
  • The paralogs of PP2A-A (Aα and Aβ) and PP2A-C (Cα and Cβ) share 87% and 98% sequence identity, respectively.

    “The paralogs of PP2A-A (Aα and Aβ) and PP2A-C (Cα and Cβ) share 87% and 98% sequence identity, respectively [ 29 , 32 ].”

    From Targeting PP2A in cancer: an underrated option (2025) · cites this paper as [32]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stone, S. R., Hofsteenge, J., & Hemmings, B. A.
Affiliations
Friedrich Miescher Institute (CH)
Venue
Biochemistry
Published
1987-11
Volume
26
Issue
23
Pages
7215-7220
ISSN
  • 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4995
OpenAlex
W2027213610
Cited by
168
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Signaling Pathways in Disease
Keywords
protein phosphatase 2A, catalytic subunit, protein isoforms, alpha and beta subunits, cDNA cloning, pigs, mRNA species, gene identity, phosphatase genes, LLC-PK1 cells
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Base Sequence, Cloning, Molecular, DNA, Genes, Isoenzymes, Molecular Sequence Data, Muscles, Phosphoprotein Phosphatases, Rabbits, Swine, Macromolecular Substances, Protein Phosphatase 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review