The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sequence-specific endoribonuclease activity of the Tetrahymena ribozyme: enhanced cleavage of certain oligonucleotide substrates that form mismatched ribozyme-substrate complexes
Abstract
A shortened form of the self-splicing intervening sequence RNA of Tetrahymena acts as a sequence-specific endoribonuclease. Specificity of cleavage is determined by Watson-Crick base pairing between the active site of the RNA enzyme (ribozyme) and its RNA substrate [Zaug, A. J., Been, M. D., & Cech, T. R. (1986) Nature (London) 324, 429-433]. Surprisingly, single-base changes in the substrate RNA 3 nucleotides preceding the cleavage site, giving a mismatched substrate-ribozyme complex, enhance the rate of cleavage. Mismatched substrates show up to a 100-fold increase in kcat and, in some cases, in kcat/Km. A mismatch introduced by changing a nucleotide in the active site of the ribozyme has a similar effect. Addition of 2.5 M urea or 3.8 M formamide or decreasing the divalent metal ion concentration from 10 to 2 mM reverses the substrate specificity, allowing the ribozyme to discriminate against the mismatched substrate. The effect of urea is to decrease kcat and kcat/Km for cleavage of the mismatched substrate; Km is not significantly affected at 0-2.5 M urea. Thus, progressive destabilization of ribozyme-substrate pairing by mismatches or by addition of a denaturant such as urea first increases the rate of cleavage to an optimum value and then decreases the rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improved free-energy parameters for predictions of RNA duplex stability.
Freier, S. M., Kierzek, R., Jaeger, J. A., Sugimoto, N., Caruthers, M. H., Neilson, T., & Turner, D. H. (1986) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.83.24.9373 · Cited by 1,470
Cited by
Sequence requirements of the hammerhead RNA self-cleavage reaction
Ruffner, D. E., Stormo, G. D., & Uhlenbeck, O. C. (1990) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00499a018 · Cited by 470
Directed Evolution of an RNA Enzyme
Beaudry, A. A., & Joyce, G. F. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1496376 · Cited by 447
Kinetic Intermediates in RNA Folding
Zarrinkar, P. P., & Williamson, J. R. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8052848 · Cited by 306
Positive regulation by small RNAs and the role of Hfq
Soper, T., Mandin, P., Majdalani, N., Gottesman, S., & Woodson, S. A. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1004435107 · Cited by 273
Generalized RNA-directed recombination of RNA
Riley, C. A., & Lehman, N. (2003) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2003.11.015 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Zaug, A. J., Grosshans, C. A., & Cech, T. R.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1988-12-13
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 8924-8931
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2060510537
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.