The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estimating the contribution of engineered surface electrostatic interactions to protein stability by using double-mutant cycles
Abstract
Coulombic interactions between charges on the surface of proteins contribute to stability. It is difficult, however, to estimate their importance by protein engineering methods because mutation of one residue in an ion pair alters the energetics of many interactions in addition to the coulombic energy between the two components. We have estimated the interaction energy between two charged residues, Asp-12 and Arg-16, in an alpha-helix on the surface of a barnase mutant by invoking a double-mutant cycle involving wild-type enzyme (Asp-12, Thr-16), the single mutants Thr----Arg-16 and Asp----Ala-12, and the double mutant Asp----Ala-12, Thr----Arg-16. The changes in free energy of unfolding of the single mutants are not additive because of the coulombic interaction energy. Additivity is restored at high concentrations of salt that shield electrostatic interactions. The geometry of the ion pair in the mutant was assumed to be the same as that in the highly homologous ribonuclease from Bacillus intermedius, binase, which has Asp-12 and Arg-16 in the native enzyme. The ion pair does not form a hydrogen-bonded salt bridge, but the charges are separated by 5-6 A. The mutant barnase containing the ion pair Asp-12/Arg-16 is more stable than wild type by 0.5 kcal/mol, but only a part of the increased stability is attributable to the electrostatic interaction. We present a formal analysis of how double-mutant cycles can be used to measure the energetics of pairwise interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Buckle, A. M., Schreiber, G., & Fersht, A. R. (1994) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00196a004 · Cited by 359
Self-citationKrylov, D., Mikhailenko, I., & Vinson, C. (1994) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06579.x · Cited by 269
Kohn, W. D., Kay, C. M., & Hodges, R. S. (1995) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.5560040210 · Cited by 124
The genetic architecture of protein interaction affinity and specificity
Bendel, A. M., Faure, A. J., Klein, D., Shimada, K., Lyautey, R., Schiffelholz, N., Kempf, G., Cavadini, S., Lehner, B., & Diss, G. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-53195-4 · Cited by 22
Molecular Recognition in Biology: Models for Analysis of Protein—Ligand Interactions
Lancet, D., Horovitz, A., & Katchalski‐Katzir, E. (1994) · Perspectives in Supramolecular Chemistry · doi:10.1002/9780470511411.ch2 · Cited by 14
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Serrano, L., Horovitz, A., Avron, B., Bycroft, M., & Fersht, A. R.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1990-10-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 40
- Pages
- 9343-9352
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2025389130
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating the contribution of engineered surface electrostatic interactions to protein stability by using double-mutant cycles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi00492a006
- The paper
- Serrano, L., Horovitz, A., Avron, B., Bycroft, M., & Fersht, A. R. (1990). Estimating the contribution of engineered surface electrostatic interactions to protein stability by using double-mutant cycles. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00492a006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.