The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Use of the polymerase chain reaction in the quantitation of MDR-1 gene expression
Abstract
The ability of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to quantitate expression of mRNA was examined in the present study. The model chosen was expression of the multidrug resistance gene mdr-1/Pgp in two colon carcinoma cell lines which express mdr-1/Pgp at levels comparable to those found in many clinical samples. PCR was utilized to evaluate differences in mdr-1/Pgp expression in the two cell lines after modulation by sodium butyrate. Thus, comparisons were made across a range of mdr-1/Pgp expression as well as comparisons of small differences. The PCR was found to be both sensitive and quantitative. Accurate quantitation requires demonstration of an exponential range which varies among samples. The exponential range can be determined by carrying out the PCR for a fixed number of cycles on serial dilutions of the RNA reverse transcription product, or by performing the reaction with a varying number of cycles on a fixed quantity of cDNA. By quantitation of the difference in PCR product derived from a given amount of RNA from the sodium butyrate treated and untreated cells, the difference in mRNA expression between samples can be determined. Normalization of the results can be achieved by independent amplification of a control gene, such as beta 2-microglobulin, when the latter is also evaluated in the exponential range. Simultaneous amplification of the control and target genes results in lower levels of PCR products due to competition, which varies from sample to sample. The PCR is thus a labor-intensive but sensitive method of quantitating gene expression in small samples of RNA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primer-Directed Enzymatic Amplification of DNA with a Thermostable DNA Polymerase
Saiki, R. K., Gelfand, D. H., Stoffel, S., Scharf, S. J., Higuchi, R., Horn, G. T., Mullis, K. B., & Erlich, H. A. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2448875 · Cited by 17,719
Cited by
Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method
Livak, K. J., & Schmittgen, T. D. (2001) · Methods · doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262 · Cited by 180,860
RAMPINO, P., PATALEO, S., GERARDI, C., MITA, G., & PERROTTA, C. (2006) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01588.x · Cited by 462
Quantitation of Cytomegalovirus: Methodologic Aspects and Clinical Applications
Boeckh, M., & Boivin, G. (1998) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.11.3.533 · Cited by 438
Niessner, M., & Volk, B. A. (2008) · Clinical and Experimental Immunology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2249.1995.tb03130.x · Cited by 388
Nagano, M., & Kelly, P. A. (1994) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(17)36838-2 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Murphy, L. D., Herzog, C. E., Rudick, J. B., Fojo, A. T., & Bates, S. E.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1990-11-13
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 45
- Pages
- 10351-10356
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2014588425
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of the polymerase chain reaction in the quantitation of MDR-1 gene expression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi00497a009
- The paper
- Murphy, L. D., Herzog, C. E., Rudick, J. B., Fojo, A. T., & Bates, S. E. (1990). Use of the polymerase chain reaction in the quantitation of MDR-1 gene expression. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00497a009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.