The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Purification using polyethylenimine precipitation and low molecular weight subunit analyses of calf thymus and wheat germ DNA-dependent RNA polymerase II
Abstract
DNA-dependent RNA polymerase II from calf thymus has been successfully purified using polythylenimine precipitation. Thus, 5-6 mg of nearly homogeneous homogeneous trna polymerase II (greater than 96% pure) can be prepared from 1 kg of calf thymus with three chromatography steps following extraction and precipitation of the enzyme from the polyethylenimine pellet. This procedure eliminates the high salt extraction of chromatin previously used in purification of this enzyme and makes possible the large scale preparation of mammalian RNA polymerase II. Calf thymus polymerase II prepared by this method is greater than 90% form IIb and consists of ten different subunits having the following molecular weights: 180 000; 145 000; 36 000; 25 000; 20 000; 18 500; 16 000; 15 000; 12 000; 11 500. The homologous enzyme isolated from wheat germ is greater than 90% form IIa and contains subunits of the following molecular weights: 206 000; 145 000; 44 000-47 000; 24 500; 21 000; 19 000; 17 000; 14 000; 13 500. The wheat germ and calf thymus enzymes exhibit similar subunits structures, but the molecular weights of individual subunits are clearly different between the enzymes. Wheat germ RNA polymerase II is 50% inhibited by 0.271 microng/mL of alpha-amanitin, a level 30-fold higher than that found for calf thymus RNA polymerase II. These enzymes are further distinguished by the absence of antigenic cross reactivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dignam, J. D., Lebovitz, R. M., & Roeder, R. G. (1983) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/11.5.1475 · Cited by 11,260
[36] Eukaryotic gene transcription with purified components
Dignam, J. D., Martin, P. L., Shastry, B. S., & Roeder, R. G. (1983) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/0076-6879(83)01039-3 · Cited by 963
A unique structure at the carboxyl terminus of the largest subunit of eukaryotic RNA polymerase II.
Corden, J. L., Cadena, D. L., Ahearn, J. M., & Dahmus, M. E. (1985) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.82.23.7934 · Cited by 354
Separation and characterization of factors mediating accurate transcription by RNA polymerase II.
Samuels, M., Fire, A., & Sharp, P. A. (1982) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)45397-0 · Cited by 292
Wobbe, C. R., & Struhl, K. (1990) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.10.8.3859 · Cited by 283
Phosphorylation of RNA polymerase by the murine homologue of the cell-cycle control protein cdc2
Cisek, L. J., & Corden, J. L. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/339679a0 · Cited by 269
Mechanisms of transcription complex assembly
Pugh, B. F. (1996) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/s0955-0674(96)80002-0 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Hodo, H. G., & Blatti, S. P.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1977-05-31
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2334-2343
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W1993219329
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.