The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fractionation of DNA from mammalian cells by alkaline elution
Abstract
The method of alkaline elution provides a sensitive measure of DNA single-strand length distribution in mamalian cells and is applicable to a variety of problems concerning DNA damage, repair, and replication. The physical basis of the elution process was studied. The kinetics of elution above the alkaline transition pH were found to occur in two phases: an initial phase in which single-strand length is rate limiting, followed by a phase in which elution is accelerated due to the accumulation of alkali-induced strand breaks. The range of DNA single-strand lengths that can be discriminated by elution above the alkaline transition pH was estimated by calibration relative to the effects of x ray, and was found to be 5 X 10(8)-10(10) daltons. Shorter DNA strands elute within the pH transition zone, which extended from pH 11.3 to 11.7 when tetrapropylammonium hydroxide was used as base. This elution was relatively rapid, but was sharply limited by pH, according to the length of the strands: the length of the strands eluted increased with increasing pH. Alkaline elution was inhibited by treatment of cells with low concentrations of nitrogen mustard, a bifunctional alkylating known to cross-link DNA. On investigation of the possibility that DNA subclasses may differ in their elution behavior, satellite L strands were found to elute more slowly from cells exposed to a low dose of x ray than did the bulk DNA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wavelength dependence of oxidative DNA damage induced by UV and visible light
Kielbassa, C. (1997) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/18.4.811 · Cited by 616
Recent advances in psoralen phototoxicity mechanism
Averbeck, D. (1989) · Photochemistry and Photobiology · doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.1989.tb02917.x · Cited by 215
Increased levels of DNA breaks in cerebral cortex of Alzheimer's disease patients
Mullaart, E., Boerrigter, M. E. T. I., Ravid, R., Swaab, D. F., & Vijg, J. (1990) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/0197-4580(90)90542-8 · Cited by 201
Photobiological studies with dioxetanes in isolated DNA, bacteria, and mammalian cells.
Adam, W., Beinhauer, A., Mosandl, T., Saha-Möller, C., Vargas, F., Epe, B., Müller, E., Schiffmann, D., & Wild, D. (1990) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.908889 · Cited by 42
The Repair of DNA Damages Induced in Normal Human Skin Fibroblasts Exposed to Simulated Sunlight
Rosenstein, B. S., & Mitchell, D. L. (1991) · Radiation Research · doi:10.2307/3577923 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Kohn, K. W., Erickson, L. C., Ewig, R. A. G., & Friedman, C. A.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1976-10-19
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 4629-4637
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2085729093
- Cited by
- 828
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fractionation of DNA from mammalian cells by alkaline elution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi00666a013
- The paper
- Kohn, K. W., Erickson, L. C., Ewig, R. A. G., & Friedman, C. A. (1976). Fractionation of DNA from mammalian cells by alkaline elution. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00666a013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.