Cited by 62Origins and Evolution of LifeRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

Processivity of Ribozyme-Catalyzed RNA Polymerization

Lawrence, Michael S., Bartel, David P.·2003·Biochemistry

Abstract

The "RNA world" hypothesis proposes that early in the evolution of life, before the appearance of DNA or protein, RNA was responsible both for encoding genetic information and for catalyzing biochemical reactions. Ribo-organisms living in the RNA world would have replicated their RNA genomes by using an RNA polymerase ribozyme. Efforts to provide experimental support for the RNA world hypothesis have focused on producing such a polymerase, and in vitro evolution methods have led to the isolation of a polymerase ribozyme that catalyzes primer extension which is accurate and general, but slow. To understand the reaction of this ribozyme, we developed a method of measuring polymerase processivity that is particularly useful in the case of an inefficient polymerase. This method allowed us to demonstrate that the polymerase ribozyme, despite its inefficiency, is partially processive. It is currently limited by a low affinity for the primer-template duplex, but once it successfully binds the primer-template duplex in the productive alignment, it catalyzes an extension reaction that is so rapid that it can occur multiple times during the short span of a single binding event. This finding contributes to the understanding of one of the more sophisticated activities yet to be generated de novo in the laboratory and sheds light on the parameters to be targeted for further optimization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bi034228l

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RPRs generally depend upon tethering to template due to their poor affinity for primer/template duplex.

    “Due to their poor affinity for primer/template duplex (Lawrence and Bartel, 2003), RPRs generally depend upon such tethering to template (Attwater et al., 2010; Wochner et al., 2011; Horning and Joyce, 2016), which enhances local ribozyme concentration and promotes formation of the RPR-primer/template holoenzyme (Attwater et al., 2010; Attwater et al., 2013a).”

    From Ribozyme-catalysed RNA synthesis using triplet building blocks (2018) · cites this paper as Lawrence and Bartel, 2003

  • The ribozyme has a catalytic rate for NTP addition of at least 1.5 min-1, but its Km is so high that it requires about 2 h to complete each NTP addition under certain conditions.

    “The ribozyme has a catalytic rate for NTP addition of at least 1.5 min -1 , but its K m is so high that, even in the presence of micromolar concentrations of oligonucleotides and millimolar concentrations of NTPs, it requires about 2 h to complete each NTP addition”

    From Protocells and RNA Self-Replication (2018) · cites this paper as Lawrence and Bartel 2003

  • R18 is not capable of self-replication because its synthetic capacity is limited, partly by weak primer/template duplex binding, and because it is unstable in the high Mg2+ concentration needed for polymerase activity.

    “However, the activity of R18 falls short of that required for self-replication in both its limited synthetic capacity (exacerbated by a low affinity for substrate primer/template duplex14) as well as its poor stability in the presence of the high concentration of Mg2+ ions (200 mM) required for polymerase activity9,15,16.”

    From In-ice evolution of RNA polymerase ribozyme activity (2013) · cites this paper as [14]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lawrence, M. S., & Bartel, D. P.
Affiliations
Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (US)
Corresponding author
Bartel, David P.
Venue
Biochemistry
Published
2003-07-01
Volume
42
Issue
29
Pages
8748-8755
ISSN
  • 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4995
OpenAlex
W2020781311
Cited by
62
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM61835)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
RNA world, polymerase processivity, primer extension, in vitro evolution, RNA replication, catalytic efficiency, RNA catalysis
MeSH terms
Catalysis, Kinetics, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Protein Binding, RNA, DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases, Time Factors, RNA, Catalytic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review