Cited by 52

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The HPV16 E7 Viral Oncoprotein Self-Assembles into Defined Spherical Oligomers

Alonso, Leonardo G., García-Alai, Maria M., Smal, Clara, Centeno, Juan M., Iacono, Rubén, Castaño, Eduardo, Gualfetti, Peter, de Prat-Gay, Gonzalo·2004·Biochemistry

Abstract

Despite the fact that E7 is a major transforming oncoprotein in papillomavirus, its structure and precise molecular mechanism of action remain puzzling to date. E7 proteins share sequence homology and proteasome targeting properties of tumor suppressors with adenovirus E1A and SV40 T antigen, two other paradigmatic oncoproteins from DNA tumor viruses. High-risk HPV16 E7, a nonglobular dimer with some properties of intrinsically disordered proteins, is capable of undergoing pH-dependent conformational transitions that expose hydrophobic surfaces to the solvent. We found that treatment with a chelating agent produced a protein that can readily assemble into homogeneous spherical particles with an average molecular mass of 790 kDa and a diameter of 50 nm, as determined from dynamic light scattering and electron microscopy. The protein undergoes a substantial conformational transition from coil to beta-sheet structure, with concomitant consolidation of tertiary structure as judged by circular dichroism and fluorescence. The assembly process is very slow, in agreement with a substantial energy barrier caused by structural rearrangements. The resulting particles are highly stable, cooperatively folded, and capable of binding both Congo Red and thioflavin T, reporters of repetitive beta-sheet structures similar to those found in amyloids, although no fibrillar or insoluble material was observed under our experimental conditions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bi036037o

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. zur Hausen H., 1996, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1288
  2. Yang L., 1993, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90
  3. Munger K., 2002, Front. Biosci. 7, d641−d649.
  4. Tommasino M., 1995, BioEssays 17, 509−518.
  5. Phelps W. C., 1988, Cell 53, 539−547.
  6. Munger K., 1993, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1155
  7. Sato H., 1989, Virology 168, 195−199.
  8. Barbosa M. S., 1990, EMBO J., 9, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08091.x · DOI
  9. Dyson N., 1989, Science 243, 934−937.
  10. Zerfass K., 1995, J. Gen. Virol., 76, 10.1099/0022-1317-76-7-1815 · DOI
  11. Chellappan S., 1992, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89
  12. Barbosa M. S., 1989, J. Virol., 63, 10.1128/jvi.63.3.1404-1407.1989 · DOI · Paper page
  13. McIntyre M. C., 1993, J. Virol., 67, 10.1128/jvi.67.6.3142-3150.1993 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Smotkin D., 1987, J. Virol., 61, 10.1128/jvi.61.5.1686-1689.1987 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Munger K., 2001, Oncogene 20, 7888−7898.
  16. Dyson H. J., 2002, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 12, 60, 10.1016/S0959-440X(02)00289-0 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Uversky V. N., 2000, Why are “natively unfolded
  18. Alonso L. G., 2002, Biochemistry 41, 10510−10518.
  19. Mok Y. K., 1996, Protein Sci. 5, 310−319.
  20. Krebs M. R., 2000, J. Mol. Biol., 300, 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3862 · DOI
  21. Hunt J. B., 1985, Anal. Biochem. 146, 150−157.
  22. Clements A., 2000, Biochemistry 39, 16033−16045.
  23. Patrick D. R., 1992, J. Biol. Chem., 267, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)50515-4 · DOI
  24. Pahel G., 1993, J. Biol. Chem., 268, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)74487-1 · DOI
  25. Clemens K. E., 1995, Virology 214, 289−293.
  26. Uversky V. N., 2002, Eur. J. Biochem., 269, 12, 10.1046/j.0014-2956.2001.02649.x · DOI
  27. LeVine H., III, 1999, Methods Enzymol. 309, 274−284.
  28. Klunk W. E., 1999, Methods Enzymol. 309, 285−305.
  29. Khurana R., 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 10.1074/jbc.M011499200 · DOI
  30. Firzlaff J. M., 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88
  31. Zwerschke W., 2000, Adv. Cancer Res., 78, 29
  32. Caspar D. L., 1962, Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 27
  33. Blundell T. L., 1996, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93
  34. Kentsis A., 2002, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99
  35. Kentsis A., 2002, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99
  36. Melnick A., 1999, Blood 93, 3167−3215.
  37. Guccione E., 2002, Virology, 293, 25, 10.1006/viro.2001.1290 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Degenkolbe R., 2003, Biochemistry 42, 3868−3873.
  39. Cole S. T., 1987, J. Mol. Biol., 193
  40. Outten C. E., 2001, Science 292, 2488−2492.
  41. Abbreviations, E7 dimer

Metadata

Authors
Alonso, L. G., García-Alai, M. M., Smal, C., Centeno, J. M., Iacono, R., Castaño, E., Gualfetti, P., & de Prat-Gay, G.
Affiliations
Instituto Leloir, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Patricias Argentinas 435, (1405) Buenos Aires, Argentina, Departamento de Quimica Biologica, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquimica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Junin 956, C1113AAD, Buenos Aires, Argentina, and Genencor International, Inc., 925 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California 94304
Venue
Biochemistry
Published
2004-03-01
Volume
43
Issue
12
Pages
3310-3317
ISSN
  • 0006-2960
  • 1520-4995
Cited by
52
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review