Cited by 46RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsProtein Structure and DynamicsDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

Molecular crowding favors reactivity of a human ribozyme under physiological ionic conditions

Open access
Strulson, Christopher A., Yennawar, Neela H., Rambo, Robert P., Bevilacqua, Philip C.·2013·Biochemistry

Abstract

In an effort to relate RNA folding to function under cellular-like conditions, we monitored the self-cleavage reaction of the human hepatitis delta virus-like CPEB3 ribozyme in the background of physiological ionic concentrations and various crowding and cosolute agents. We found that at physiological free Mg(2+) concentrations (∼0.1-0.5 mM), both crowders and cosolutes stimulate the rate of self-cleavage, up to ∼6-fold, but that in 10 mM Mg(2+) (conditions widely used for in vitro ribozyme studies) these same additives have virtually no effect on the self-cleavage rate. We further observe a dependence of the self-cleavage rate on crowder size, wherein the level of rate stimulation is diminished for crowders larger than the size of the unfolded RNA. Monitoring effects of crowding and cosolute agents on rates in biological amounts of urea revealed additive-promoted increases at both low and high Mg(2+) concentrations, with a maximal stimulation of more than 10-fold and a rescue of the rate to its urea-free values. Small-angle X-ray scattering experiments reveal a structural basis for this stimulation in that higher-molecular weight crowding agents favor a more compact form of the ribozyme in 0.5 mM Mg(2+) that is essentially equivalent to the form under standard ribozyme conditions of 10 mM Mg(2+) without a crowder. This finding suggests that at least a portion of the rate enhancement arises from favoring the native RNA tertiary structure. We conclude that cellular-like crowding supports ribozyme reactivity by favoring a compact form of the ribozyme, but only under physiological ionic and cosolute conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bi400816s

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Crowding effects contribute to the folding stability of ribozymes and reduce the effect of otherwise deleterious mutations.

    “since crowding effects contribute to the folding stability of ribozymes [144–148] and reduce the effect of otherwise deleterious mutations [149].”

    From The RNA world as a model system to study the origin of life (2015) · cites this paper as [147]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [21]Nakano S Hirayama H Miyoshi D Sugimoto N 2012 Dimerization of nucleic acid hairpins in the conditions caused by neutral cosolutes J Phys Chem B 116 7406 7415 22703387
  2. [41]Knowles DB LaCroix AS Deines NF Shkel I Record MT 2011 Separation of preferential interaction and excluded volume effects on DNA duplex and hairpin stability Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108 12699 12704 21742980 PMC3150925
  3. [45]Feig AL Uhlenbeck OC 1999 The role of metal Ions in RNA biochemistry The RNA World Cold Spring Harbor Press New York
  4. [60]Nakano S Karimata HT Kitagawa Y Sugimoto N 2009 Facilitation of RNA enzyme activity in the molecular crowding media of cosolutes J Am Chem Soc 131 16881 16888 19874030

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Strulson, C. A., Yennawar, N. H., Rambo, R. P., & Bevilacqua, P. C.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Bevilacqua, Philip C.
Venue
Biochemistry
Published
2013-11-04
Volume
52
Issue
46
Pages
8187-8197
ISSN
  • 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4995
OpenAlex
W2045194452
Cited by
46
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX13AI01G)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
macromolecular crowding, hepatitis delta virus, self-cleavage, RNA tertiary structure, magnesium content, urea, cosolutes, RNA folding
MeSH terms
Hepatitis Delta Virus, Humans, Magnesium, Models, Molecular, Molecular Weight, Urea, X-Ray Diffraction, RNA, Catalytic, RNA-Binding Proteins, Scattering, Small Angle, RNA Folding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review