Cited by 149Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsProtein Structure and DynamicsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Conformational changes specific for pseudophosphorylation at serine 262 selectively impair binding of tau to microtubules

Fischer, Daniela, Mukrasch, Marco D., Biernat, Jacek, Bibow, Stefan, Blackledge, Martin, Griesinger, Christian, Mandelkow, Eckhard, Zweckstetter, Markus·2009·Biochemistry

Abstract

Aggregation of the microtubule-associated protein tau into neurofibrillary tangles is the pathological hallmark of a variety of dementias. For reasons not yet known, tau becomes excessively phosphorylated in Alzheimer's brains and as a result no longer binds properly to microtubules. Here we studied the impact of phosphorylation on the conformational and binding properties of the repeat region of tau (K18) that is necessary for microtubule assembly and forms the core of paired helical filaments. To mimic phosphorylation, we introduced four mutations of serine to glutamate residues at positions 262, 293, 324, and 356. NMR spectroscopy demonstrates that pseudophosphorylation at these sites modifies the structural properties in repeats 1 and 2, in particular for Gln265-Lys267. Gln265-Lys267 are in close proximity to Ser262, the phosphorylation site that most strongly attenuates binding to microtubules. In contrast, the pseudophosphorylation mimic of tau efficiently interacts with the polyanion heparin. Thus, phosphorylation of the repeat region of natively unfolded tau induces specific conformational changes that have a strong impact on its biological function and involvement in disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bi901090m

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fischer, D., Mukrasch, M. D., Biernat, J., Bibow, S., Blackledge, M., Griesinger, C., Mandelkow, E., & Zweckstetter, M.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry (DE)
  • Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY (DE)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Max Planck Unit for Structural Molecular Biology, c/o DESY, Notkestrasse 85, 22607 Hamburg, Germany
Corresponding author
Zweckstetter, Markus
Venue
Biochemistry
Published
2009-10-01
Volume
48
Issue
42
Pages
10047-10055
ISSN
  • 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4995
OpenAlex
W2082617925
Cited by
149
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (submittedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
tau protein, microtubule binding, neurofibrillary tangles, Alzheimer's disease, paired helical filaments, intrinsically disordered proteins, heparin binding, protein conformational change
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Binding Sites, Circular Dichroism, Humans, Microtubules, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Phosphorylation, Protein Conformation, Serine, tau Proteins, Glutamic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review