Cited by 181Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Morphological criteria for the recognition of Alzheimer's disease and the distribution pattern of cortical changes related to this disorder

Braak, Heiko, Braak, Eva·1994·Neurobiology of Aging

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0197-4580(94)90032-9

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Braak, H., & Braak, E.
Affiliations
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-05
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
355-356
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997018685
Cited by
181
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, neurodegenerative diseases, perioperative care, preoperative assessment, delirium, cognitive aging, behavioral characteristics, dementia screening, cortical changes, surgical patients
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Neurons, Pyramidal Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review