Cited by 68

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The intrinsic protein flexibility of endogenous protease inhibitor TIMP-1 controls its binding interface and affects its function.

Grossman, Moran, Tworowski, Dmitry, Dym, Orly, Lee, Meng-Huee, Levy, Yaakov, Murphy, Gillian, Sagi, Irit·2010·Biochemistry

Abstract

Protein flexibility is thought to play key roles in numerous biological processes, including antibody affinity maturation, signal transduction, and enzyme catalysis, yet only limited information is available regarding the molecular details linking protein dynamics with function. A single point mutation at the distal site of the endogenous tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1) enables this clinical target protein to tightly bind and inhibit membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) by increasing only the association constant. The high-resolution X-ray structure of this complex determined at 2 A could not explain the mechanism of enhanced binding and pointed to a role for protein conformational dynamics. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations reveal that the high-affinity TIMP-1 mutants exhibit significantly reduced binding interface flexibility and more stable hydrogen bond networks. This was accompanied by a redistribution of the ensemble of substrates to favorable binding conformations that fit the enzyme catalytic site. Apparently, the decrease in backbone flexibility led to a lower entropy cost upon formation of the complex. This work quantifies the effect of a single point mutation on the protein conformational dynamics and function of TIMP-1. Here we argue that controlling the intrinsic protein dynamics of MMP endogenous inhibitors may be utilized for rationalizing the design of selective novel protein inhibitors for this class of enzymes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bi902141x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. Eisenmesser E. Z., 2005, Nature, 438, 117, 10.1038/nature04105 · DOI
  2. Boehr D. D., 2006, Science, 313, 1638, 10.1126/science.1130258 · DOI
  3. Miyashita O., 2003, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 100, 12570, 10.1073/pnas.2135471100 · DOI
  4. Smock R. G., 2009, Science, 324, 198, 10.1126/science.1169377 · DOI
  5. Ikeguchi M., 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 94, 078102, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.078102 · DOI
  6. Tokuriki N., 2009, Science, 324, 203, 10.1126/science.1169375 · DOI
  7. Watney J. B., 2003, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 125, 3745, 10.1021/ja028487u · DOI
  8. Maillard R. A., 2008, J. Biol. Chem., 283, 613, 10.1074/jbc.M706031200 · DOI
  9. Clarkson M. W., 2004, Biochemistry, 43, 12448, 10.1021/bi0494424 · DOI
  10. Pizzitutti F., 2006, J. Mol. Recognit., 19, 1, 10.1002/jmr.748 · DOI
  11. Pan H., 2000, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 97, 12020, 10.1073/pnas.220240297 · DOI
  12. Nagase H., 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 21491, 10.1074/jbc.274.31.21491 · DOI
  13. Sternlicht M. D., 2001, Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev Biol., 17, 463, 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.17.1.463 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Lopez-Otin C., 2007, Nat. Rev. Cancer, 7, 800, 10.1038/nrc2228 · DOI
  15. Page-McCaw A., 2007, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 8, 221, 10.1038/nrm2125 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Birkedal-Hansen H., 1995, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 7, 728, 10.1016/0955-0674(95)80116-2 · DOI
  17. Gomis-Ruth F. X., 1997, Nature, 389, 77, 10.1038/37995 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Tuuttila A., 1998, J. Mol. Biol., 284, 1133, 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2223 · DOI
  19. Williamson R. A., 1994, Biochemistry, 33, 11745, 10.1021/bi00205a010 · DOI
  20. Fernandez-Catalan C., 1998, EMBO J., 17, 5238, 10.1093/emboj/17.17.5238 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Maskos K., 2007, J. Mol. Biol., 366, 1222, 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.11.072 · DOI
  22. Huang W., 1996, FEBS Lett., 384, 155, 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00304-3 · DOI
  23. Murphy G., 1991, Biochemistry, 30, 8097, 10.1021/bi00247a001 · DOI
  24. Nguyen Q., 1994, Biochemistry, 33, 2089, 10.1021/bi00174a015 · DOI
  25. Lee M. H., 2001, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 280, 945, 10.1006/bbrc.2000.4192 · DOI
  26. Sato H., 1996, FEBS Lett., 393, 101, 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00861-7 · DOI
  27. Will H., 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 17119, 10.1074/jbc.271.29.17119 · DOI
  28. Lang R., 2004, J. Mol. Biol., 336, 213, 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.12.022 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Lee M. H., 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 17562, 10.1074/jbc.M312589200 · DOI
  30. Lee M. H., 2002, Protein Sci., 11, 2493, 10.1110/ps.0216202 · DOI
  31. Dudek M. J., 1998, J. Comput. Chem., 19, 548, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19980415)19:5<548::AID-JCC7>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
  32. Pettersen E. F., 2004, J. Comput. Chem., 25, 1605, 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI
  33. Van Gunsteren W. F., 1998, Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry, 2
  34. Scott W. R. P., 1999, J. Phys. Chem. A, 103, 3596, 10.1021/jp984217f · DOI
  35. Berendsen H. J. C., 1984, J. Chem. Phys., 81, 3684, 10.1063/1.448118 · DOI
  36. Schlitter J., 1993, Chem. Phys. Lett., 215, 617, 10.1016/0009-2614(93)89366-P · DOI
  37. Otwinowski Z., 1997, Methods Enzymol., 276, 307, 10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76066-X · DOI · Paper page
  38. French G. S., 1978, Acta Crystallogr., 34, 517, 10.1107/S0567739478001114 · DOI
  39. Murshudov G. N., 1997, Acta Crystallogr., 53, 240
  40. Emsley P., 2004, Acta Crystallogr., 60, 2126
  41. Chen V. B., 2010, Acta Crystallogr., 66, 12, 10.1107/S0108767310099757 · DOI
  42. Rajamani D., 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 101, 11287, 10.1073/pnas.0401942101 · DOI
  43. Lee M. H., 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 40224, 10.1074/jbc.M305678200 · DOI
  44. Grunberg R., 2006, Structure, 14, 683, 10.1016/j.str.2006.01.014 · DOI
  45. Arumugam S., 2003, J. Mol. Biol., 327, 719, 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00180-3 · DOI
  46. Bertini I., 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 102, 5334, 10.1073/pnas.0407106102 · DOI
  47. Iyer S., 2007, J. Biol. Chem., 282, 364, 10.1074/jbc.M607625200 · DOI
  48. Thorpe I. F., 2007, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 104, 8821, 10.1073/pnas.0610064104 · DOI
  49. Park S., 2005, J. Mol. Biol., 348, 75, 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.12.062 · DOI
  50. Manson A., 2009, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 131, 6785, 10.1021/ja809133u · DOI
  51. Schrank T. P., 2009, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 106, 16984, 10.1073/pnas.0906510106 · DOI
  52. Frederick K. K., 2007, Nature, 448, 325, 10.1038/nature05959 · DOI
  53. Tzeng S. R., 2009, Nature, 462, 368, 10.1038/nature08560 · DOI
  54. Whittaker M., 1999, Chem. Rev., 99, 2735, 10.1021/cr9804543 · DOI
  55. Cuniasse P., 2005, Biochimie, 87, 393, 10.1016/j.biochi.2004.09.025 · DOI
  56. Cuniasse P., 2005, Biochimie, 87, 393, 10.1016/j.biochi.2004.09.025 · DOI
  57. Solomon A., 2007, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 104, 4931, 10.1073/pnas.0700066104 · DOI
  58. Meng Q., 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 10184, 10.1074/jbc.274.15.10184 · DOI
  59. Hamze A. B., 2007, Protein Sci., 16, 1905, 10.1110/ps.072978507 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Grossman, M., Tworowski, D., Dym, O., Lee, M.-H., Levy, Y., Murphy, G., & Sagi, I.
Affiliations
  • Department of Structural Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
  • Department of Oncology, Cambridge University, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, United Kingdom
Venue
Biochemistry
Published
2010-06-29
Volume
49
Issue
29
Pages
6184-6192
ISSN
  • 0006-2960
  • 1520-4995
Cited by
68
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review