The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Correlation between Dynamics and High Affinity Binding in an SH2 Domain Interaction
Abstract
Protein-protein interfaces can consist of interactions between large numbers of residues of each molecule; some of these interactions are critical in determining binding affinity and conferring specificity, while others appear to play only a marginal role. Src-homology-2 (SH2) domains bind to proteins containing phosphorylated tyrosines, with additional specificity provided by interactions with residues C-terminal to the phosphotyrosine (pTyr) residue. While the C-terminal SH2 domain of phospholipase C-gamma 1 (PLCC SH2) interacts with eight residues of a pTyr-containing peptide from its high affinity binding site on the beta-platelet-derived growth factor receptor, it can still bind tightly to a phosphopeptide containing only three residues. Novel deuterium (2H) based nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spin relaxation experiments which probe the nanosecond-picosecond time scale dynamics of methyl containing side chain residues have established that certain regions of the PLCC SH2 domain contacting the residues C-terminal to the pTyr have a high degree of mobility in both the free and peptide complexed states. In contrast, there is significant restriction of motion in the pTyr binding site. These results suggest a correlation between the dynamic behavior of certain groups in the PLCC SH2 complex and their contribution to high affinity binding and binding specificity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lipari, G., & Szabo, A. (1982) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00381a009 · Cited by 3,777
Protein modules and signalling networks
Pawson, T. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/373573a0 · Cited by 2,420
Cited by
Igumenova, T. I., Frederick, K. K., & Wand, A. J. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040422h · Cited by 314
Saul, F. A., Arié, J.-P., Vulliez-le Normand, B., Kahn, R., Betton, J.-M., & Bentley, G. A. (2004) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2003.10.056 · Cited by 130
Buchko, G. W., Daughdrill, G. W., de Lorimier, R., Sudha Rao B. K., Isern, N. G., Lingbeck, J. M., Taylor, J.-S., Wold, M. S., Gochin, M., Spicer, L. D., et al. (1999) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi991755p · Cited by 83
Calcium‐ and FK506‐independent interaction between the immunophilin FKBP51 and calcineurin*
Li, T., Baksh, S., Cristillo, A. D., & Bierer, B. E. (2002) · Journal of Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/jcb.10026 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Kay, L. E., Muhandiram, D. R., Farrow, N. A., Aubin, Y., & Forman-Kay, J. D.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 361-368
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2043039723
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correlation between Dynamics and High Affinity Binding in an SH2 Domain Interaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi9522312
- The paper
- Kay, L. E., Muhandiram, D. R., Farrow, N. A., Aubin, Y., & Forman-Kay, J. D. (1996). Correlation between Dynamics and High Affinity Binding in an SH2 Domain Interaction. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi9522312
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.