The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The B-DNA Dodecamer at High Resolution Reveals a Spine of Water on Sodium,
Abstract
We describe a very accurate addition (called structure X here) to the B-DNA dodecamer family of X-ray structures. Our results confirm the observation of Drew and Dickerson [(1981) J. Mol. Biol. 151, 535-556] that the spine of hydration in AT tract DNA is two layers deep. However, our results suggest that the primary spine is partially occupied by sodium ions. We suggest that many sequence-dependent features of DNA conformation are mediated by site specific binding of cations. For example, preferential localization of cations, as described here within the minor groove of structure X, is probably the structural origin of AT tract bending and groove narrowing. The secondary spine, which does not interact directly with the DNA, is as geometrically regular as the primary spine, providing a model for transmission of sequence information into solvent regions. A fully hydrated magnesium ion located in the major groove of structure X appears to pull cytosine bases partially out from the helical stack, exposing pi-systems to partial positive charges of the magnesium ion and its outer sphere. A partially ordered spermine molecule is located within the major groove of structure X. Dodecamer structures are derived from crystals of [d(CGCGAATTCGCG)]2 in space group P212121 (a = 25 A, b = 40 A, and c = 66 A). On average, those crystals diffracted to around 2.5 A resolution with 2500 unique reflections. Structure X, with the same space group, DNA sequence, and crystal form as the "Dickerson dodecamer", is refined against a complete, low-temperature, 1.4 A resolution data set, with over 11000 reflections. Structure X appears to be conformationally more ordered than previous structures, suggesting that at least a portion of the conformational heterogeneity previously attributed to DNA sequence in fact arises from experimental error.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins.
Chothia, C., & Lesk, A. M. (1986) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04288.x · Cited by 2,458
Cited by
Darden, T., Perera, L., Li, L., & Pedersen, L. (1999) · Structure · doi:10.1016/s0969-2126(99)80033-1 · Cited by 676
Lemkul, J. A., Huang, J., Roux, B., & MacKerell, A. D. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00505 · Cited by 623
Validation of the 53A6 GROMOS force field
Oostenbrink, C., Soares, T. A., van der Vegt, N. F. A., & van Gunsteren, W. F. (2005) · European Biophysics Journal · doi:10.1007/s00249-004-0448-6 · Cited by 485
Retinoic acid receptors: From molecular mechanisms to cancer therapy
di Masi, A., Leboffe, L., De Marinis, E., Pagano, F., Cicconi, L., Rochette-Egly, C., Lo-Coco, F., Ascenzi, P., & Nervi, C. (2015) · Molecular Aspects of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mam.2014.12.003 · Cited by 403
Makarov, V., Pettitt, B. M., & Feig, M. (2002) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar0100273 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Shui, X., McFail-Isom, L., Hu, G. G., & Williams, L. D.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-05-22
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 8341-8355
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2158098325
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.