Cited by 58

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Structural Independence of Ligand-Binding Modules Five and Six of the LDL Receptor

North, Christopher L., Blacklow, Stephen C.·1999·Biochemistry

Abstract

The low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) is the primary mechanism for the uptake of plasma cholesterol into cells and serves as a prototype for a growing family of cell surface receptors. These receptors all utilize tandemly repeated LDL-A modules to bind their ligands. Each LDL-A module is about 40 residues long, has six conserved cysteine residues, and contains a conserved acidic region near the C-terminus which serves as a calcium-binding site. The structure of the interface presented for ligand binding by these modules, and the basis for their specificity and affinity in ligand binding, is not yet known. We have purified recombinant molecules corresponding to LDL-A modules five (LR5), six (LR6), and the module five-six pair (LR5-6) of the LDL receptor. Calcium is required to establish native disulfide bonds and to maintain the structural integrity of LR5, LR6, and the LR5-6 module pair. Folding studies of the I189D and D206Y mutations within LR5 indicate that each change leads to misfolding of the module, explaining the previous observation that each of these changes mimics the functional effect of deletion of the entire module [Russell, D. W., Brown, M. S., and Goldstein, J. L. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 21682-21688]. By fluorescence, the affinity of LR5 for calcium, which is crucial for folding and function of these modules, remains approximately 40 nM whether LR6 is attached. Comparison of proton and multidimensional heteronuclear NMR spectra of individual modules t…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bi9821622

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Brown M. S., 1986, Science, 232, 47, 10.1126/science.3513311 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Goldstein J. L., 1995, in The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease
  3. Yamamoto T., 1984, Cell, 39, 38, 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90188-0 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Sakai J., 1994, J. Biol. Chem., 269, 2173, 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)42151-X · DOI
  5. Saito A., 1994, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91, 9725−9729
  6. Kim D. H., 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271
  7. Herz J., 1988, EMBO J., 7, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03306.x · DOI
  8. Bates P., 1993, Cell 74, 1043−1051
  9. Hobart M. J., 1993, Biochemistry 32, 6198−6205
  10. Marazziti D., 1988, Biochemistry 27, 6529−6534
  11. Russell D. W., 1989, J. Biol. Chem., 264
  12. Daly N. L., 1995, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 6334−6338
  13. Daly N. L., 1995, Biochemistry 34, 14474−14481
  14. Fass D., 1997, Nature 388, 691−693
  15. Goldstein J. L., 1974, J. Biol. Chem., 249, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)42341-7 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Atkins A. R., 1998, Biochemistry 37, 1662−1670
  17. Blacklow S. C., 1996, Nat. Struct. Biol. 3, 758−762
  18. Schneider W. J., 1997, Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 8, 315−319
  19. Bieri S., 1998, Biochemistry 37, 10994−11002
  20. Sambrook J., 1989, Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual
  21. Kunkel T. A., 1987, Methods Enzymol. 154, 367−382
  22. McIntosh L. P., 1990, Q. Rev. Biophys., 23, 38, 10.1017/S0033583500005400 · DOI
  23. Studier F. W., 1990, Methods Enzymol., 185, 89, 10.1016/0076-6879(90)85009-D · DOI
  24. Peng Z. Y., 1994, Biochemistry 33, 2136−2141
  25. Bers, D. M., Patton, C. W. and Nuccitelli, R. (1994) inMethods in Cell Biology(Nuccitelli, R., Ed.) Vol. 40, pp 3−29, Academic Press, San Diego. · DOI
  26. Piotto M., 1992, J. Biomol. NMR, 2, 10.1007/BF02192855 · DOI
  27. Bodenhausen G., 1980, Chem. Phys. Lett., 69, 10.1016/0009-2614(80)80041-8 · DOI
  28. Bieri S., 1995, Biochemistry 34, 13059−13065
  29. Bieri S., 1995, FEBS Lett., 371
  30. Djordjevic J. T., 1996, Eur. J. Biochem., 239, 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0214u.x · DOI
  31. Dirlam-Schatz K. A., 1998, J. Lipid Res., 39
  32. Campbell I. D., 1998, Nat. Struct. Biol. 5 (Suppl), 496−499
  33. Knott V., 1996, J. Mol. Biol., 255, 27, 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0003 · DOI
  34. Downing A. K., 1996, Cell 85, 597−605
  35. Eck M. J., 1994, Nature 368, 764−769
  36. Xu W., 1997, Nature 385, 595−602
  37. Sicheri F., 1997, Nature 385, 602−609
  38. Saxena K., 1997, Biochemistry 36, 15940−15948
  39. Esser V., 1988, J. Biol. Chem., 263
  40. Dirlam K. A., 1996, Protein Expression Purif. 8, 489−500
  41. Simmons T., 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 10.1074/jbc.272.41.25531 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Abbreviations, atomic mass unit

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
North, C. L., & Blacklow, S. C.
Affiliations
Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Venue
Biochemistry
Published
1999-03-01
Volume
38
Issue
13
Pages
3926-3935
ISSN
  • 0006-2960
  • 1520-4995
Cited by
58
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review