The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nearest-Neighbor Thermodynamics and NMR of DNA Sequences with Internal A·A, C·C, G·G, and T·T Mismatches
Abstract
Thermodynamic measurements are reported for 51 DNA duplexes with A.A, C.C, G.G, and T.T single mismatches in all possible Watson-Crick contexts. These measurements were used to test the applicability of the nearest-neighbor model and to calculate the 16 unique nearest-neighbor parameters for the 4 single like with like base mismatches next to a Watson-Crick pair. The observed trend in stabilities of mismatches at 37 degrees C is G.G > T.T approximately A.A > C.C. The observed stability trend for the closing Watson-Crick pair on the 5' side of the mismatch is G.C >/= C.G >/= A.T >/= T.A. The mismatch contribution to duplex stability ranges from -2.22 kcal/mol for GGC.GGC to +2.66 kcal/mol for ACT.ACT. The mismatch nearest-neighbor parameters predict the measured thermodynamics with average deviations of DeltaG degrees 37 = 3.3%, DeltaH degrees = 7. 4%, DeltaS degrees = 8.1%, and TM = 1.1 degrees C. The imino proton region of 1-D NMR spectra shows that G.G and T.T mismatches form hydrogen-bonded structures that vary depending on the Watson-Crick context. The data reported here combined with our previous work provide for the first time a complete set of thermodynamic parameters for molecular recognition of DNA by DNA with or without single internal mismatches. The results are useful for primer design and understanding the mechanism of triplet repeat diseases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biochemical Basis of DNA Replication Fidelity
Goodman, M. F., Creighton, S., Bloom, L. B., Petruska, J., & Kunkel, T. A. (1993) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.3109/10409239309086792 · Cited by 446
Cited by
Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction
Zuker, M. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkg595 · Cited by 13,404
Kunkel, T. A., & Erie, D. A. (2005) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133243 · Cited by 1,367
What Controls the Melting Properties of DNA-Linked Gold Nanoparticle Assemblies?
Jin, R., Wu, G., Li, Z., Mirkin, C. A., & Schatz, G. C. (2003) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja021096v · Cited by 1,359
The Thermodynamics of DNA Structural Motifs
SantaLucia, J., & Hicks, D. (2004) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.32.110601.141800 · Cited by 1,314
Self-citationPerlPrimer: cross-platform, graphical primer design for standard, bisulphite and real-time PCR
Marshall, O. J. (2004) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth254 · Cited by 677
Metadata
- Authors
- Peyret, N., Seneviratne, P. A., Allawi, H. T., & SantaLucia, J.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-03-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3468-3477
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2149681483
- Cited by
- 568
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nearest-Neighbor Thermodynamics and NMR of DNA Sequences with Internal A·A, C·C, G·G, and T·T Mismatches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi9825091
- The paper
- Peyret, N., Seneviratne, P. A., Allawi, H. T., & SantaLucia, J. (1999). Nearest-Neighbor Thermodynamics and NMR of DNA Sequences with Internal A·A, C·C, G·G, and T·T Mismatches. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi9825091
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.