The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanism of Interaction of Different Classes of Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides with Planar Bilayers and with the Cytoplasmic Membrane of Escherichia coli
Abstract
Antimicrobial cationic peptides are prevalent throughout nature as part of the intrinsic defenses of most organisms, and have been proposed as a blueprint for the design of novel antimicrobial agents. They are known to interact with membranes, and it has been frequently proposed that this represents their antibacterial target. To see if this was a general mechanism of action, we studied the interaction, with model membranes and the cytoplasmic membrane of Escherichia coli, of 12 peptides representing all 4 structural classes of antimicrobial peptides. Planar lipid bilayer studies indicated that there was considerable variance in the interactions of the peptides with model phospholipid membranes, but generally both high concentrations of peptide and high transmembrane voltages (usually -180 mV) were required to observe conductance events (channels). The channels observed for most peptides varied widely in magnitude and duration. An assay was developed to measure the interaction with the Escherichia coli cytoplasmic membrane employing the membrane potential sensitive dye 3,5-dipropylthiacarbocyanine in the outer membrane barrier-defective E. coli strain DC2. It was demonstrated that individual peptides varied widely in their ability to depolarize the cytoplasmic membrane potential of E. coli, with certain peptides such as the loop peptide bactenecin and the alpha-helical peptide CP26 being unable to cause depolarization at the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), and others like gramicidin S causing maximal depolarization below the MIC. We discuss the mechanism of interaction with the cytoplasmic membrane in terms of the model of Matsuzaki et al. [(1998) Biochemistry 37, 15144-15153] and the possibility that the cytoplasmic membrane is not the target for some or even most cationic antimicrobial peptides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Deep Learning Approach to Antibiotic Discovery
Stokes, J. M., Yang, K., Swanson, K., Jin, W., Cubillos-Ruiz, A., Donghia, N. M., MacNair, C. R., French, S., Carfrae, L. A., Bloom-Ackermann, Z., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.021 · Cited by 2,463
Amphipathic, α-helical antimicrobial peptides
Tossi, A., Sandri, L., & Giangaspero, A. (2000) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/1097-0282(2000)55:1<4::aid-bip30>3.0.co;2-m · Cited by 1,247
Cationic peptides: effectors in innate immunity and novel antimicrobials
Hancock, R. E. (2001) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(01)00092-5 · Cited by 978
Self-citationPeptoids that mimic the structure, function, and mechanism of helical antimicrobial peptides
Chongsiriwatana, N. P., Patch, J. A., Czyzewski, A. M., Dohm, M. T., Ivankin, A., Gidalevitz, D., Zuckermann, R. N., & Barron, A. E. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0708254105 · Cited by 657
Alternative mechanisms of action of cationic antimicrobial peptides on bacteria
Hale, J. D., & Hancock, R. E. (2007) · Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy · doi:10.1586/14787210.5.6.951 · Cited by 549
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, M., Maier, E., Benz, R., & Hancock, R. E. W.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-05-14
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 7235-7242
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2004373761
- Cited by
- 736
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanism of Interaction of Different Classes of Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides with Planar Bilayers and with the Cytoplasmic Membrane of Escherichia coli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi9826299
- The paper
- Wu, M., Maier, E., Benz, R., & Hancock, R. E. W. (1999). Mechanism of Interaction of Different Classes of Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides with Planar Bilayers and with the Cytoplasmic Membrane of Escherichia coli. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi9826299
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.