The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sequence and Structural Selectivity of Nucleic Acid Binding Ligands
Abstract
The sequence and structural selectivity of 15 different DNA binding agents was explored using a novel, thermodynamically rigorous, competition dialysis procedure. In the competition dialysis method, 13 different nucleic acid structures were dialyzed against a common ligand solution. More ligand accumulated in the dialysis tube containing the structural form with the highest ligand binding affinity. DNA structural forms included in the assay ranged from single-stranded forms, through a variety of duplex forms, to multistranded triplex and tetraplex forms. Left-handed Z-DNA, RNA, and a DNA-RNA hybrid were also represented. Standard intercalators (ethidium, daunorubicin, and actinomycin D) served as control compounds and were found to show structural binding preferences fully consistent with their previously published behavior. Standard groove binding agents (DAPI, distamycin, and netropsin) showed a strong preference for AT-rich duplex DNA forms, along with apparently strong binding to the poly(dA)-[poly(dT)](2) triplex. Thermal denaturation studies revealed the apparent triplex binding to be complex, and perhaps to result from displacement of the third strand. Putative triplex (BePI, coralyne, and berberine) and tetraplex [H(2)TmPyP, 5,10,15, 20-tetrakis[4-(trimethylammonio)phenyl]-21H,23H-porphine, and N-methyl mesoporphyrin IX] selective agents showed in many cases less dramatic binding selectivity than anticipated from published reports that compared their binding to only a few structural forms. Coralyne was found to bind strongly to single-stranded poly(dA), a novel and previously unreported interaction. Finally, three compounds (berenil, chromomycin A, and pyrenemethylamine) whose structural preferences are largely unknown were examined. Pyrenemethylamine exhibited an unexpected and unprecedented preference for duplex poly(dAdT).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A hitchhiker's guide to G-quadruplex ligands
Monchaud, D., & Teulade-Fichou, M.-P. (2008) · Org. Biomol. Chem. · doi:10.1039/b714772b · Cited by 788
DNA minor-groove recognition by small molecules (up to 2000)
Neidle, S. (2001) · Natural Product Reports · doi:10.1039/a705982e · Cited by 494
Rohs, R. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki1008 · Cited by 294
Rudimentary G-quadruplex-based telomere capping in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Smith, J. S., Chen, Q., Yatsunyk, L. A., Nicoludis, J. M., Garcia, M. S., Kranaster, R., Balasubramanian, S., Monchaud, D., Teulade-Fichou, M.-P., Abramowitz, L., et al. (2011) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2033 · Cited by 135
Grant, L., Sun, J., Xu, H., Subramony, S. H., Chaires, J. B., & Hebert, M. D. (2006) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2006.09.006 · Cited by 36
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ren, J., & Chaires, J. B.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-11-16
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 49
- Pages
- 16067-16075
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2115639078
- Cited by
- 564
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sequence and Structural Selectivity of Nucleic Acid Binding Ligands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi992070s
- The paper
- Ren, J., & Chaires, J. B. (1999). Sequence and Structural Selectivity of Nucleic Acid Binding Ligands. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi992070s
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.