Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 500

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Models for Carbon Isotope Fractionation Between Diet and Bone

KRUEGER, HAROLD W., SULLIVAN, CHARLES H.·1984·ACS Symposium Series

Abstract

Dietary evaluation using isotopic analyses of carbon in collagen from bone is an exciting new area of archaeological chemistry. Analyses of bone from herbivores, carnivores, and omnivores (including humans) suggest that a simple isotopic fractionation between dietary carbon and carbon in bone collagen may be an inadequate model for interpretation of results. Dietary carbohydrates are primarily metabolized for energy and their carbon is reflected mainly in the hydroxyapatite of bone. Dietary lipids are also important energy components of the diet. Dietary proteins, on the other hand, are utilized for protein (e.g. bone collagen) synthesis as needed and only excess amino acids are metabolized for energy. Herbivores, carnivores, and omnivores thus might have different isotopic fractionation models, each of which is presented. Biochemical evidence in support of these models is discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bk-1984-0258.ch014

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
KRUEGER, H. W., & SULLIVAN, C. H.
Venue
ACS Symposium Series
Published
1984-07-09
Pages
205-220
ISSN
  • 0097-6156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1947-5918
OpenAlex
W848873940
Cited by
500
References
0
FWCI
6.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.