The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Complex Coacervation of Whey Proteins and Gum Arabic
Open accessAbstract
Mixtures of gum arabic and whey protein (whey protein isolate, WP) form an electrostatic complex in a specific pH range. Three phase boundaries (pH(c), pHphi(1), pHphi(2)) have been determined using an original titration method, newly applied to complex coacervation. It consists of monitoring the turbidity and light scattering intensity under slow acidification in situ with glucono-delta-lactone. Furthermore, the particle size could also be measured in parallel by dynamic light scattering. When the pH is lowered, whey proteins and gum arabic first form soluble complexes. This boundary is designated as pH(c). When the interaction is stronger (at lower pH), phase separation takes place (at pHphi(1)). Finally, at pHphi(2) complexation was suppressed by the charge reduction of the gum arabic. The major constituent of the whey protein preparation used was beta-lactoglobulin (beta-lg), and it was shown that beta-lg was indeed the main complex-forming protein. Moreover, an increase of the ionic strength shifted the pH boundaries to lower pH values, which was summarized in a state diagram. The experimental pH(c) values were compared to a newly developed theory for polyelectrolyte adsorption on heterogeneous surfaces. Finally, the influence of the total biopolymer concentration (0-20% w/w) was represented in a phase diagram. For concentrations below 12%, the results are consistent with the theory on complex coacervation developed by Overbeek and Voorn. However, for concentrations above 12%, phase diagrams surprisingly revealed a "metastable" region delimited by a percolation line. Overall, a strong similarity is seen between the behavior of this system and a colloidal gas-liquid phase separation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Food proteins: A review on their emulsifying properties using a structure–function approach
Lam, R. S. H., & Nickerson, M. T. (2013) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.04.038 · Cited by 895
Protein/polysaccharide complexes and coacervates in food systems
Schmitt, C., & Turgeon, S. L. (2011) · Advances in Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.cis.2010.10.001 · Cited by 874
Role of polysaccharides in food, digestion, and health
Lovegrove, A., Edwards, C. H., De Noni, I., Patel, H., El, S. N., Grassby, T., Zielke, C., Ulmius, M., Nilsson, L., Butterworth, P. J., et al. (2017) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2014.939263 · Cited by 606
“The resulting aggregates may either behave as soluble complexes (Weinbreck et al., 2003) or become insoluble”
BackgroundProtein–polysaccharide interactions: phase-ordering kinetics, thermodynamic and structural aspects
Turgeon, S. L., Beaulieu, M., Schmitt, C., & Sanchez, C. (2003) · Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science · doi:10.1016/s1359-0294(03)00093-1 · Cited by 470
Complex coacervate‐based materials for biomedicine
Blocher, W. C., & Perry, S. L. (2017) · WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1002/wnan.1442 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Weinbreck, F., de Vries, R., Schrooyen, P., & de Kruif, C. G.
- Venue
- Biomacromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-01-30
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 293-303
- ISSN
- 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4602
- OpenAlex
- W1987016368
- Cited by
- 612
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complex Coacervation of Whey Proteins and Gum Arabic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bm025667n
- The paper
- Weinbreck, F., de Vries, R., Schrooyen, P., & de Kruif, C. G. (2003). Complex Coacervation of Whey Proteins and Gum Arabic. Biomacromolecules. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm025667n
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.