The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Structure and Morphology Changes during in Vitro Degradation of Electrospun Poly(glycolide-co-lactide) Nanofiber Membrane
Abstract
Electrospun poly(glycolide-co-lactide) (PLA10GA90, LA/GA ratio 10/90) biodegradable nanofiber membranes possessed very high surface area to volume ratios and were completely noncrystalline with a relatively lowered glass transition temperature. These characteristics led to very different structure, morphology, and property changes during in vitro degradation, which were examined systematically. A shrinkage study showed that the electrospun crystallizable but amorphous PLA10GA90 membranes exhibited a very small shrinkage percentage when compared with the electrospun membranes of noncrystallizable poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLA75GA25, LA/GA 75/25) and poly(d,l-lactide). Although the weight loss of electrospun PLA10GA90 membranes exhibited a similar degradation behavior as cast thin films, detailed studies showed that the structure and morphology changes in electrospun membranes followed different pathways during the hydrolytic degradation. After 1 day of degradation in buffer solution at 37 degrees C, electrospun PLA10GA90 membranes exhibited a sudden increase in crystallinity and glass transition temperature, due to the fast thermally induced crystallization process. The continuous increase in crystallinity and apparent crystal size, as well as the decrease in long period and lamellae thickness, indicated that the thermally induced crystallization was followed by a chain cleavage induced crystallization process. The mass loss rate was accelerated after 6 days of degradation. The increase in glass transition temperature during this period further confirmed that the degradation of PLA10GA90 nanofibers was initiated from the amorphous region within the lamellar superstructures. A mechanism of structure and morphology changes during in vitro degradation of electrospun PLA10GA90 nanofibers is proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Aligned electrospun polymer fibres for skeletal muscle regeneration
School of Materials, B. G., Aviss, K., Gough, J., & Downes, S. (2010) · European Cells and Materials · doi:10.22203/ecm.v019a19 · Cited by 253
Deng, M., Kumbar, S. G., Nair, L. S., Weikel, A. L., Allcock, H. R., & Laurencin, C. T. (2011) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201100275 · Cited by 143
Wang, T., Yang, X., Qi, X., & Jiang, C. (2015) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-015-0499-8 · Cited by 83
Fundamental insights in PLGA degradation from thin film studies
Machatschek, R., & Lendlein, A. (2020) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.12.044 · Cited by 73
Sabbatier, G., Larrañaga, A., Guay‐Bégin, A., Fernandez, J., Diéval, F., Durand, B., Sarasua, J., & Laroche, G. (2015) · Macromolecular Bioscience · doi:10.1002/mabi.201500130 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Zong, X., Ran, S., Kim, K.-S., Fang, D., Hsiao, B. S., & Chu, B.
- Venue
- Biomacromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-02-15
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 416-423
- ISSN
- 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4602
- OpenAlex
- W2077211217
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure and Morphology Changes during in Vitro Degradation of Electrospun Poly(glycolide-co-lactide) Nanofiber Membrane. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bm025717o
- The paper
- Zong, X., Ran, S., Kim, K.-S., Fang, D., Hsiao, B. S., & Chu, B. (2003). Structure and Morphology Changes during in Vitro Degradation of Electrospun Poly(glycolide-co-lactide) Nanofiber Membrane. Biomacromolecules. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm025717o
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.