The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural Details of Crystalline Cellulose from Higher Plants
Abstract
It is commonly assumed that cellulose from higher plants contains the Ialpha and Ibeta crystalline allomorphs together with surface and disordered chains. For cellulose Ialpha, the evidence for its presence in higher plants is restricted to the C-4 signals in the solid-state (13)C NMR spectrum, which match those of crystalline cellulose Ialpha from algal sources. Algal cellulose Ialpha can be converted to the Ibeta form by high-temperature annealing. We used this approach to generate cellulose samples differing in Ibeta content from flax fibers and celery collenchyma, which respectively are representative of textile (secondary-wall) and primary-wall cellulose. It was then possible to isolate the detailed spectral contributions of the surface, Ibeta and Ialpha-like phases from linear combinations of the observed (13)C NMR and FTIR spectra. The (13)C NMR spectra resembled those of highly crystalline tunicate or algal cellulose Ibeta and Ialpha, with slight differences implying increased disorder and minor conformational discrepancies. The FTIR spectrum of the Ibeta form was closely similar to its more crystalline counterparts, but the FTIR spectrum of the Ialpha form was not. In addition to increased bandwith indicative of lower order, it showed substantial differences in the profile of hydroxyl stretching bands. These results confirm that higher plants synthesize cellulose Ibeta but show that the Ialpha-like chains, although conformationally quite similar to crystalline algal cellulose Ialpha, sit in a different hydrogen-bonding environment in higher plants. The differences are presumably occasioned by the small diameter of the crystallites and the influence of the crystallite surface on chain packing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sugiyama, J., Vuong, R., & Chanzy, H. (1991) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00014a033 · Cited by 791
Self-citationCombined infrared and electron diffraction study of the polymorphism of native celluloses
Sugiyama, J., Persson, J., & Chanzy, H. (1991) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00009a050 · Cited by 541
Self-citation
Cited by
Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications
Habibi, Y., Lucia, L. A., & Rojas, O. J. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900339w · Cited by 5,980
Usov, I., Nyström, G., Adamcik, J., Handschin, S., Schütz, C., Fall, A., Bergström, L., & Mezzenga, R. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8564 · Cited by 498
Computer simulation studies of microcrystalline cellulose Iβ
Matthews, J. F., Skopec, C. E., Mason, P. E., Zuccato, P., Torget, R. W., Sugiyama, J., Himmel, M. E., & Brady, J. W. (2006) · Carbohydrate Research · doi:10.1016/j.carres.2005.09.028 · Cited by 398
Self-citationSecondary cell wall biosynthesis
Zhong, R., Cui, D., & Ye, Z. (2019) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15537 · Cited by 373
Vegetable nanocellulose in food science: A review
Gómez H., C., Serpa, A., Velásquez-Cock, J., Gañán, P., Castro, C., Vélez, L., & Zuluaga, R. (2016) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.01.023 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Šturcová, A., His, I., Apperley, D. C., Sugiyama, J., & Jarvis, M. C.
- Venue
- Biomacromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-06-22
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1333-1339
- ISSN
- 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4602
- OpenAlex
- W2033944769
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structural Details of Crystalline Cellulose from Higher Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bm034517p
- The paper
- Šturcová, A., His, I., Apperley, D. C., Sugiyama, J., & Jarvis, M. C. (2004). Structural Details of Crystalline Cellulose from Higher Plants. Biomacromolecules. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm034517p
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.