The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electro-Spinning and Electro-Blowing of Hyaluronic Acid
Abstract
In this study, hyaluronic acid (HA) was electro-spun and electro-blown to prepare nonwoven nanofibrous membranes. Critical parameters for processing and corresponding effects on the membrane morphology were investigated using the methods of rheology and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). During electro-spinning, the optimal HA concentration window for nanofibrous formation was determined within a narrow range of 1.3-1.5 w/v %, corresponding to a solution viscosity range of 3-30 Pa s at a shear rate of 1 s(-1). SEM results indicated that, with increases in (1) the total concentration by blending of low molecular weight HA, (2) the evaporation rate by the addition of ethanol, and/or (3) the feeding rate of solution, the electro-spinning performance for creating nanofibers was improved. However, the improvement was not sufficient to achieve a consistent production of high quality nonwoven nanofiber membranes. This problem was overcome by a new electro-blowing process using the combination of air flow and electro-spinning. Although air blowing at room temperature around the spinneret orifice did not exhibit a remarkable enhancement of nanofiber formation of HA, the performance was significantly improved with an increase in the air blowing rate. SEM results showed that the temperature of air-blowing was the most effective parameter in ensuring HA nanofiber formation. As the temperature of the blown air increased from 25 to 57 degrees C, the nanofiber formation became consistent and uniform. A high quality HA nonwoven membrane of nanofibers was successfully produced by blowing air at 57 degrees C with a 70 ft(3)/hr flow rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A review on electrospinning design and nanofibre assemblies
Teo, W. E., & Ramakrishna, S. (2006) · Nanotechnology · doi:10.1088/0957-4484/17/14/r01 · Cited by 2,289
Polymeric Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering Application: A Review
Dhandayuthapani, B., Yoshida, Y., Maekawa, T., & Kumar, D. S. (2011) · International Journal of Polymer Science · doi:10.1155/2011/290602 · Cited by 1,773
Nanofibers and their applications in tissue engineering
Vasita, R., & Katti, D. S. (2006) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/nano.2006.1.1.15 · Cited by 988
NANOFIBROUS MATERIALS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS
Burger, C., Hsiao, B. S., & Chu, B. (2006) · Annual Review of Materials Research · doi:10.1146/annurev.matsci.36.011205.123537 · Cited by 622
Self-citationWang, X., Ding, B., Sun, G., Wang, M., & Yu, J. (2013) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.05.001 · Cited by 533
Functional nanofibers for environmental applications
Yoon, K., Hsiao, B. S., & Chu, B. (2008) · Journal of Materials Chemistry · doi:10.1039/b804128h · Cited by 416
Self-citationElectrospun three-dimensional hyaluronic acid nanofibrous scaffolds
Ji, Y., Ghosh, K., Shu, X. Z., Li, B., Sokolov, J. C., Prestwich, G. D., Clark, R. A. F., & Rafailovich, M. H. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.037 · Cited by 395
Technological advances in electrospinning of nanofibers
Teo, W.-E., Inai, R., & Ramakrishna, S. (2011) · Science and Technology of Advanced Materials · doi:10.1088/1468-6996/12/1/013002 · Cited by 361
Coaxial Electrospinning Formation of Complex Polymer Fibers and their Applications
Han, D., & Steckl, A. J. (2019) · ChemPlusChem · doi:10.1002/cplu.201900281 · Cited by 355
Uhljar, L. É., & Ambrus, R. (2023) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15020417 · Cited by 108
Fabrication and characterization of zein‐based nanofibrous scaffolds by an electrospinning method
Jiang, H., Zhao, P., & Zhu, K. (2007) · Macromolecular Bioscience · doi:10.1002/mabi.200600277 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Um, I. C., Fang, D., Hsiao, B. S., Okamoto, A., & Chu, B.
- Venue
- Biomacromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-05-07
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1428-1436
- ISSN
- 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4602
- OpenAlex
- W2084772555
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.