The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Production of Starch Foams by Twin-Screw Extrusion: Effect of Maleated Poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) as a Compatibilizer
Abstract
Free-radical-initiated grafting of maleic anhydride (MA) onto poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT), a biodegradable aliphatic-aromatic copolyester, was performed by reactive extrusion. 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di(tert-butylperoxy)hexane was used as the free-radical initiator. The peroxide concentration was varied between 0.0 and 0.5 wt % at 3.0 wt % MA concentration; the MA concentration was varied between 1.0 and 5.0 wt % at 0.5 wt % peroxide concentration. The reaction temperature was maintained at 185 degrees C for all experiments. Under these conditions, between 0.194% and 0.691% MA was grafted onto the polyester backbone. Size-exclusion chromatography, melt flow index, intrinsic viscosity measurements, thermal gravimetric analysis, and differential scanning calorimetry were used to characterize the maleated copolyester. Increasing the initiator concentration at a constant MA concentration of 3% resulted in an increase in the grafting of MA while decreasing the molecular weight of the resulting polymer. Increasing the feed MA concentration also increased the grafting percentage. The maleation of the polyester proved to be very efficient in promoting strong interfacial adhesion with high amylose cornstarch in starch foams as prepared by melt blending. Thus, the use of maleated copolyester as a compatibilizer between starch and PBAT allowed the reduction of the density of resulting starch foams to approximately 21 kg/m3 and improved the resilience from 84% to as high as 95%. Also, the resulting starch foams exhibited improved hydrophobic properties in terms of lower weight gain and higher dimensional stability on moisture sorption.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biodegradable compatibilized polymer blends for packaging applications: A literature review
Muthuraj, R., Misra, M., & Mohanty, A. K. (2018) · Journal of Applied Polymer Science · doi:10.1002/app.45726 · Cited by 391
C−H Functionalization of Commodity Polymers
Williamson, J. B., Lewis, S. E., Johnson, R. R., Manning, I. M., & Leibfarth, F. A. (2019) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201810970 · Cited by 313
Harada, M., Ohya, T., Iida, K., Hayashi, H., Hirano, K., & Fukuda, H. (2007) · Journal of Applied Polymer Science · doi:10.1002/app.26717 · Cited by 254
Polycaprolactone: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications
Guarino, V., Gentile, G., Sorrentino, L., & Ambrosio, L. (2017) · Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/0471440264.pst658 · Cited by 163
Muthuraj, R., Misra, M., & Mohanty, A. K. (2015) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00646 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Nabar, Y., Raquez, J. M., Dubois, P., & Narayan, R.
- Venue
- Biomacromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-01-13
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 807-817
- ISSN
- 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4602
- OpenAlex
- W2031161199
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Production of Starch Foams by Twin-Screw Extrusion: Effect of Maleated Poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) as a Compatibilizer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bm0494242
- The paper
- Nabar, Y., Raquez, J. M., Dubois, P., & Narayan, R. (2005). Production of Starch Foams by Twin-Screw Extrusion: Effect of Maleated Poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) as a Compatibilizer. Biomacromolecules. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0494242
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.