The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
One-Pot Synthesis of PEGylated Ultrasmall Iron-Oxide Nanoparticles and Their in Vivo Evaluation as Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agents
Abstract
A well-defined copolymer poly(oligo(ethylene glycol) methacrylate-co-methacrylic acid) P(OEGMA-co-MAA) was studied as a novel water-soluble biocompatible coating for superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. This copolymer was prepared via a two-step procedure: a well-defined precursor poly(oligo(ethylene glycol) methacrylate-co-tert-butyl methacrylate), P(OEGMA-co-tBMA) (M(n) = 17300 g mol(-1); M(w)/M(n) = 1.22), was first synthesized by atom-transfer radical polymerization in the presence of the catalyst system copper(I) chloride/2,2'-bipyridyl and subsequently selectively hydrolyzed in acidic conditions. The resulting P(OEGMA-co-MAA) was directly utilized as a polymeric stabilizer in the nanoparticle synthesis. Four batches of ultrasmall PEGylated magnetite nanoparticles (i.e., with an average diameter below 30 nm) were prepared via aqueous coprecipitation of iron salts in the presence of variable amounts of P(OEGMA-co-MAA). The diameter of the nanoparticles could be easily tuned in the range 10-25 nm by varying the initial copolymer concentration. Moreover, the formed PEGylated ferrofluids exhibited a long-term colloidal stability in physiological buffer and could therefore be studied in vivo by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Intravenous injection into rats showed no detectable signal in the liver within the first 2 h. Maximum liver accumulation was found after 6 h, suggesting a prolongated circulation of the nanoparticles in the bloodstream as compared to conventional MR imaging contrast agents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hamm, B., Staks, T., Taupitz, M., Maibauer, R., Speidel, A., Huppertz, A., Frenzel, T., Lawaczeck, R., Wolf, K. J., & Lange, L. (1994) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.1880040508 · Cited by 187
Cited by
Reddy, L. H., Arias, J. L., Nicolas, J., & Couvreur, P. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300068p · Cited by 2,010
Lutz, J. (2008) · Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry · doi:10.1002/pola.22706 · Cited by 1,245
Self-citationThermoresponsive Polymers for Biomedical Applications
Ward, M. A., & Georgiou, T. K. (2011) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym3031215 · Cited by 1,158
Atrp in the design of functional materials for biomedical applications
Siegwart, D. J., Oh, J. K., & Matyjaszewski, K. (2012) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.08.001 · Cited by 613
Figuerola, A., Di Corato, R., Manna, L., & Pellegrino, T. (2010) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2009.12.012 · Cited by 480
Metadata
- Authors
- Lutz, J.-F., Stiller, S., Hoth, A., Kaufner, L., Pison, U., & Cartier, R.
- Venue
- Biomacromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-10-25
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3132-3138
- ISSN
- 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4602
- OpenAlex
- W2008216183
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.