The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Supramolecular Structure Characterization of Cellulose II Nanowhiskers Produced by Acid Hydrolysis of Cellulose I Substrates
Open accessAbstract
Cellulose II nanowhiskers (CNW-II) were produced by treatment of microcrystalline cellulose with sulfuric acid by both controlling the amount of H(2)SO(4) introduced and the time of addition during the hydrolysis process. The crystalline structure was confirmed by both XRD and (13)C CP-MAS NMR spectroscopy. When observed between crossed polarizers, the cellulose II suspension displayed flow birefringence and was stable for several months. The CNW-II nanowhiskers were significantly smaller than the cellulose I nanowhiskers (CNW-I) and had a rounded shape at the tip. The CNW-II average length and height were estimated by AFM to be 153 ± 66 and 4.2 ± 1.5 nm, respectively. An average width of 6.3 ± 1.7 nm was found by TEM, suggesting a ribbon-shape morphology for these whiskers. The average dimensions of the CNW-II elementary crystallites were estimated from the XRD data, using Scherrer's equation. A tentative cross-sectional geometry consistent with both XRD and NMR data was then proposed and compared with the geometry of the CNW-I nanowhiskers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications
Habibi, Y., Lucia, L. A., & Rojas, O. J. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900339w · Cited by 5,980
Beck-Candanedo, S., Roman, M., & Gray, D. G. (2005) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm049300p · Cited by 1,588
Optimization of the isolation of nanocrystals from microcrystalline cellulose by acid hydrolysis
Bondeson, D., Mathew, A., & Oksman, K. (2006) · Cellulose · doi:10.1007/s10570-006-9061-4 · Cited by 1,372
Cellulosic Bionanocomposites: A Review of Preparation, Properties and Applications
Siqueira, G., Bras, J., & Dufresne, A. (2010) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym2040728 · Cited by 1,328
Effect of microcrystallite preparation conditions on the formation of colloid crystals of cellulose
DONG, X. M., REVOL, J.-F., & GRAY, D. G. (1998) · Cellulose · doi:10.1023/a:1009260511939 · Cited by 1,032
Sugiyama, J., Vuong, R., & Chanzy, H. (1991) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00014a033 · Cited by 791
Cited by
Current characterization methods for cellulose nanomaterials
Foster, E. J., Moon, R. J., Agarwal, U. P., Bortner, M. J., Bras, J., Camarero-Espinosa, S., Chan, K. J., Clift, M. J. D., Cranston, E. D., Eichhorn, S. J., et al. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00895j · Cited by 1,021
Han, J., Zhou, C., Wu, Y., Liu, F., & Wu, Q. (2013) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm4001734 · Cited by 490
Pracella, M., Haque, M. M.-U., & Puglia, D. (2014) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2014.06.071 · Cited by 193
Tran, C. D., Duri, S., Delneri, A., & Franko, M. (2013) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.02.046 · Cited by 121
Tang, X., Liu, G., Zhang, H., Gao, X., Li, M., & Zhang, S. (2021) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117591 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Sèbe, G., Ham-Pichavant, F., Ibarboure, E., Koffi, A. L. C., & Tingaut, P.
- Venue
- Biomacromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-02-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 570-578
- ISSN
- 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4602
- OpenAlex
- W2015006866
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 4.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
