Cited by 239Biofuel production and bioconversionCatalysis for Biomass ConversionThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes

Potential Synergies and Challenges in Refining Cellulosic Biomass to Fuels, Chemicals, and Power

Wyman, Charles E.·2003·Biotechnology Progress

Abstract

Lignocellulosic biomass such as agricultural and forestry residues and dedicated crops provides a low‐cost and uniquely sustainable resource for production of many organic fuels and chemicals that can reduce greenhouse gas emissions, enhance energy security, improve the economy, dispose of problematic solid wastes, and improve air quality. A technoeconomic analysis of biologically processing lignocellulosics to ethanol is adapted to project the cost of making sugar intermediates for producing a range of such products, and sugar costs are predicted to drop with plant size as a result of economies of scale that outweigh increased biomass transport costs for facilities processing less than about 10,000 dry tons per day. Criteria are then reviewed for identifying promising chemicals in addition to fuel ethanol to make from these low cost cellulosic sugars. It is found that the large market for ethanol makes it possible to achieve economies of scale that reduce sugar costs, and coproducing chemicals promises greater profit margins or lower production costs for a given return on investment. Additionally, power can be sold at low prices without a significant impact on the selling price of sugars. However, manufacture of multiple products introduces additional technical, marketing, risk, scale‐up, and other challenges that must be considered in refining of lignocellulosics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bp025654l

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transition to non-food sources such as lignocellulosic biomass is an important direction to lower production costs and avoid resource competition with the food supply.

    “Transition to non-food sources such as lignocellulosic biomass is an important direction to lower the production costs [78][79][80] and to avoid resource competition with the food supply.”

    From Catalysis as an Enabling Science for Sustainable Polymers (2018) · cites this paper as [80]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wyman, C. E.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Wyman, Charles E.
Venue
Biotechnology Progress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
254-262
ISSN
  • 1520-6033 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-7938
OpenAlex
W2084850984
Cited by
239
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 21
FWCI
7.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biotechnology Progress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Catalysis for Biomass Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Keywords
lignocellulosic biomass, cellulosic ethanol, cellulosic sugars, biorefinery, economies of scale, biomass transport costs, techno-economic analysis, sugar production costs, biomass power generation, agricultural residues, forest residues, scale-up challenges
MeSH terms
Ethanol, Carbohydrates, Cellulose, Conservation of Natural Resources, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Energy-Generating Resources, Lignin, United States, Biomass, Bioreactors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review