Potential Synergies and Challenges in Refining Cellulosic Biomass to Fuels, Chemicals, and Power
Abstract
Lignocellulosic biomass such as agricultural and forestry residues and dedicated crops provides a low‐cost and uniquely sustainable resource for production of many organic fuels and chemicals that can reduce greenhouse gas emissions, enhance energy security, improve the economy, dispose of problematic solid wastes, and improve air quality. A technoeconomic analysis of biologically processing lignocellulosics to ethanol is adapted to project the cost of making sugar intermediates for producing a range of such products, and sugar costs are predicted to drop with plant size as a result of economies of scale that outweigh increased biomass transport costs for facilities processing less than about 10,000 dry tons per day. Criteria are then reviewed for identifying promising chemicals in addition to fuel ethanol to make from these low cost cellulosic sugars. It is found that the large market for ethanol makes it possible to achieve economies of scale that reduce sugar costs, and coproducing chemicals promises greater profit margins or lower production costs for a given return on investment. Additionally, power can be sold at low prices without a significant impact on the selling price of sugars. However, manufacture of multiple products introduces additional technical, marketing, risk, scale‐up, and other challenges that must be considered in refining of lignocellulosics.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Transition to non-food sources such as lignocellulosic biomass is an important direction to lower production costs and avoid resource competition with the food supply.
“Transition to non-food sources such as lignocellulosic biomass is an important direction to lower the production costs [78][79][80] and to avoid resource competition with the food supply.”
From Catalysis as an Enabling Science for Sustainable Polymers (2018) · cites this paper as [80]
Cites
Fuel ethanol from cellulosic biomass
Lynd, L. R., Cushman, J. H., Nichols, R. J., & Wyman, C. E. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.251.4999.1318 · Cited by 965 · see citing works
Self-citationLynd, L. R., Wyman, C. E., & Gerngross, T. U. (1999) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1021/bp990109e · Cited by 723 · see citing works
Self-citationB IOMASS E THANOL : Technical Progress, Opportunities, and Commercial Challenges
Wyman, C. E. (1999) · Annual Review of Energy and the Environment · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.24.1.189 · Cited by 601 · see citing works
Self-citationWooley, R. J., Ruth, M. F., Sheehan, J., Ibsen, K. N., Majdeski, H., & Galvez, A. (1999) · doi:10.2172/12150 · Cited by 458 · see citing works
Wooley, R. J., Ruth, M. F., Glassner, D. A., & Sheehan, J. (1999) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1021/bp990107u · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Preliminary estimate of the cost of ethanol production for ssf technology
Hinman, N. D., Schell, D. J., Riley, J. J., Bergeron, P. W., & Walter, P. J. (1992) · Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/bf02920584 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Biotechnology for production of fuels, chemicals, and materials from biomass
Wyman, C., & Goodman, B. J. (1993) · Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/bf02918976 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Self-citationAlternative fuels from biomass and their impact on carbon dioxide accumulation
Wyman, C. E. (1994) · Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/bf02941858 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Self-citationWyman, C. E. (2001) · Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology · doi:10.1385/abab:91-93:1-9:5 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Self-citationLanducci, R., Goodman, B. J., & Wyman, C. E. (1994) · Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/bf02941840 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Self-citationTechnology for Electricity and Fuels from Biomass
Larson, E. D. (1993) · Annual Review of Energy and the Environment · doi:10.1146/annurev.eg.18.110193.003031 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Fuel cycle evaluations of biomass-ethanol and reformulated gasoline. Volume 1
National Renewable Energy Lab., G., Tyson, K., USDOE, W., et al. (1993) · doi:10.2172/10107273 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Bozell, J. J., & Landucci, R. (1993) · doi:10.2172/939508 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Busche, R. M. (1985) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1002/btpr.5420010306 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
The 1992 Symposium on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Mitigation Research
(1992) · Boundary-Layer Meteorology · doi:10.1007/bf00119819 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sustainable management of coffee industry by-products and value addition—a review
Murthy, P. S., & Madhava Naidu, M. (2012) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.06.005 · Cited by 1,055 · see citing works
Fuel ethanol production: Process design trends and integration opportunities
Cardona, C. A., & Sánchez, Ó. J. (2007) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.002 · Cited by 1,032 · see citing works
Catalysis as an Enabling Science for Sustainable Polymers
Zhang, X., Fevre, M., Jones, G. O., & Waymouth, R. M. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00329 · Cited by 936 · see citing works
Reviving the carbohydrate economy via multi-product lignocellulose biorefineries
Zhang, Y.-H. P. (2008) · Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s10295-007-0293-6 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
the alcohol-to-jet conversion pathway for drop-in biofuels: techno-economic evaluation
Geleynse, S., Brandt, K., Garcia‐Perez, M., Wolcott, M., & Zhang, X. (2018) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.201801690 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
De Corato, U., De Bari, I., Viola, E., & Pugliese, M. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.02.041 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Chemicals from biomass: technological <i>versus</i> environmental feasibility. A review
Fiorentino, G., Ripa, M., & Ulgiati, S. (2017) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.1729 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Lu, H., Yadav, V., Bilal, M., & Iqbal, H. M. N. (2022) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132574 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
2016 Bioenergy Industry Status Report
National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), G., Moriarty, K., USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), B. T. O. (.-3., Milbrandt, A., Warner, E., Lewis, J., & Schwab, A. (2018) · doi:10.2172/1431426 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wyman, C. E.
- Affiliations
- Dartmouth College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wyman, Charles E.
- ORCID
- Wyman, Charles E.
- Venue
- Biotechnology Progress
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 254-262
- ISSN
- 1520-6033 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-7938
- OpenAlex
- W2084850984
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 7.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biotechnology Progress (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Catalysis for Biomass Conversion
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Keywords
- lignocellulosic biomass, cellulosic ethanol, cellulosic sugars, biorefinery, economies of scale, biomass transport costs, techno-economic analysis, sugar production costs, biomass power generation, agricultural residues, forest residues, scale-up challenges
- MeSH terms
- Ethanol, Carbohydrates, Cellulose, Conservation of Natural Resources, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Energy-Generating Resources, Lignin, United States, Biomass, Bioreactors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review