Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rhamnolipid Surfactants: An Update on the General Aspects of These Remarkable Biomolecules

Nitschke, Marcia, Costa, Siddhartha G. V. A. O., Contiero, Jonas·2005·Biotechnology Progress
DOI 10.1021/bp050239p
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Pseudomonas strains are able to biosynthesize rhamnose‐containing surfactants also known as rhamnolipids. These surface‐active compounds are reviewed with respect to chemical structure, properties, biosynthesis, and physiological role, focusing on their production and the use of low‐cost substrates such as wastes from food industries as alternative carbon sources. The use of inexpensive raw materials such as agroindustrial wastes is an attractive strategy to reduce the production costs associated with biosurfactant production and, at same time, contribute to the reduction of environmental impact generated by the discard of residues, and the treatment costs. Carbohydrate‐rich substrates generated low rhamnolipid levels, whereas oils and lipid‐rich wastes have shown excellent potential as alternative carbon sources.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bp050239p

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 300

Metadata

Authors
Nitschke, M., Costa, S. G. V. A. O., & Contiero, J.
Venue
Biotechnology Progress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-01
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
1593-1600
ISSN
  • 1520-6033 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-7938
DOI
10.1021/bp050239p
OpenAlex
W2059607527
Cited by
300
References
63
FWCI
11.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.