Cited by 16Advanced Drug Delivery SystemsAdvancements in Transdermal Drug DeliveryDiabetes Management and Research

Distribution of [3H]Dexamethasone in Rat Subcutaneous Tissue after Delivery from Osmotic Pumps

Moussy, Y., Hersh, L., Dungel, P.·2006·Biotechnology Progress

Abstract

Inflammation surrounding implantable glucose sensors may be controlled through local release of dexamethasone at the site of implantation. In the present study, we evaluated the distribution of dexamethasone in rat subcutaneous tissue during the first 2.5 days after local release. Osmotic pumps containing [3H]dexamethasone were implanted into the subcutaneous tissue of rats. Digital autoradiography was used to measure the distribution of the [3H]dexamethasone within the subcutaneous tissue at 6, 24, and 60 h after implantation. Measured concentration profiles, near the catheter tip through which the agent was released, were compared to mathematical models of drug diffusion and elimination. The results demonstrate that the majority of the [3H]dexamethasone delivered into the subcutaneous tissue was found within a 3 mm region surrounding the catheter tip. There was good agreement between the experimental data and the mathematical model. The diffusion coefficient for dexamethasone in subcutaneous tissue was found to be D = 4.11 +/- 1.77 x 10(-10) m2/s, and the elimination rate constant was found to be k = 3.65 +/- 2.24 x 10(-5) s(-1). The diffusion coefficient and elimination rate constants for dexamethasone in subcutaneous tissue have not been previously reported. The use of a mathematical model may be useful in predicting the effectiveness of local delivery of dexamethasone around implantable glucose sensors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bp060031j

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Moussy et al. reported that locally administered [3H]dexamethasone travelled an average of only 2.70 mm from the delivery point after 24 h.

    “Moussy et al. reported that [3H]DX travelled only an average of 2.70 mm from the point of delivery after 24 h when administered locally.180”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moussy, Y., Hersh, L., & Dungel, P.
Affiliations
University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Moussy, Y.
Venue
Biotechnology Progress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-06-02
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
819-824
ISSN
  • 1520-6033 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-7938
OpenAlex
W1990085094
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biotechnology Progress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (5 R01 EB01640-03, R01EB001640)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
dexamethasone, subcutaneous tissue, osmotic pump, local drug delivery, implantable glucose sensor, drug diffusion, diffusion coefficient, elimination rate constant, tissue inflammation, autoradiography
MeSH terms
Animals, Autoradiography, Dexamethasone, Injections, Subcutaneous, Male, Models, Biological, Osmotic Pressure, Tritium, Infusion Pumps, Implantable, Drug Delivery Systems, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Cell Culture Techniques, Subcutaneous Tissue, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review