The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating the Distribution of Cellulases and the Recycling of Free Cellulases during the Hydrolysis of Lignocellulosic Substrates
Abstract
The recycling of cellulase enzymes is one potential strategy for reducing the cost of the enzymatic hydrolysis step during the bioconversion of lignocellulosics to ethanol. To determine the influence of lignin on the post‐hydrolysis distribution of cellulase enzymes between the liquid and solid phases, the hydrolysis of Avicel was compared to an organosolv‐pretreated Douglas fir substrate with a lignin content of 3.0%. After a 12 h hydrolysis reaction on Avicel, 90% of the added cellulases (including β‐glucosidases) remained “free” in the liquid phase compared to only 65% in the case of the hydrolysis of the organosolv‐pretreated Douglas fir substrate. The readsorption of free cellulases by supplementing the hydrolysis reaction with fresh substrate was explored as a potential means of recovering the free cellulases that remain in the liquid phase after hydrolysis. The Langmuir adsorption isotherm was used to develop a model predicting that 82% of the free cellulases could be recovered via readsorption onto fresh substrates during the hydrolysis of an ethanol‐pretreated mixed softwood substrate with a lignin content of 6%. Recoverable free cellulase values of 85% and 88% based on cellulase activity and protein content, respectively, were obtained after experimental verification of the model. The readsorption of free cellulases onto fresh lignocellulosic substrates was shown to be an effective method for free enzyme recovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass
MOSIER, N. (2005) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.025 · Cited by 6,251
Wingren, A., Galbe, M., & Zacchi, G. (2008) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1021/bp0340180 · Cited by 675
The Lignol Approach to Biorefining of Woody Biomass to Produce Ethanol and Chemicals
Arato, C., Pye, E. K., & Gjennestad, G. (2005) · Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology · doi:10.1385/abab:123:1-3:0871 · Cited by 214
Cited by
Enzymatic conversion of lignocellulose into fermentable sugars: challenges and opportunities
Jørgensen, H., Kristensen, J. B., & Felby, C. (2007) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.4 · Cited by 1,143
Acid-based hydrolysis processes for ethanol from lignocellulosic materials: A review
Taherzadeh, M. J., & Karimi, K. (2007) · BioResources · doi:10.15376/biores.2.3.472-499 · Cited by 1,013
Microbial cellulases and their industrial applications
Kuhad, R. C., Gupta, R., & Singh, A. (2011) · Enzyme Research · doi:10.4061/2011/280696 · Cited by 953
Modeling cellulase kinetics on lignocellulosic substrates
Bansal, P., Hall, M., Realff, M. J., Lee, J. H., & Bommarius, A. S. (2009) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.06.005 · Cited by 416
Rollin, J. A., Zhu, Z., Sathitsuksanoh, N., & Zhang, Y. ‐. P. (2011) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.22919 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Tu, M., Chandra, R. P., & Saddler, J. N.
- Venue
- Biotechnology Progress
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 398-406
- ISSN
- 1520-6033 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-7938
- OpenAlex
- W1964197960
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.