The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Metabolic Engineering of Propanediol Pathways
Abstract
Microbial fermentation is an important technology for the conversion of renewable resources to chemicals. In this paper, we describe the application of metabolic engineering for the development of two new fermentation processes: the microbial conversion of sugars to 1,3-propanediol (1,3-PD) and 1,2-propanediol (1,2-PD). A variety of naturally occurring organisms ferment glycerol to 1,3-PD, but no natural organisms ferment sugars directly to 1,3-PD. We first describe the fed-batch fermentation of glycerol to 1,3-PD by Klebsiella pneumoniae. We then present various approaches for the conversion of sugars to 1,3-PD, including mixed-culture fermentation, cofermentation of glycerol and glucose, and metabolic engineering of a "sugars to 1,3-PD" pathway in a single organism. Initial results are reported for the expression of genes from the K. pneumoniae 1,3-PD pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The best naturally occurring organism for the fermentation of sugars to 1,2-PD is Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum. We describe the fermentation of several different sugars to 1,2-PD by this organism in batch and continuous culture. We report that Escherichia coli strains engineered to express either aldose reductase or glycerol dehydrogenase convert glucose to (R)-1,2-PD. We then analyze the ultimate potential of fermentation processes for the production of propanediols. Linear optimization studies indicate that, under aerobic conditions, propanediol yields that approach the theoretical maximum are possible and CO2 is the primary coproduct. Without the need to produce acetate, final product titers in the range of 100 g/L should be possible; the high titers and low coproduct levels should make product recovery and purification straightforward. The examples given in this paper illustrate the importance of metabolic engineering for fermentation process development in general.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bozell, J. J., & Petersen, G. R. (2010) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/b922014c · Cited by 4,566
Burgard, A. P., Pharkya, P., & Maranas, C. D. (2003) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.10803 · Cited by 1,256
Anaerobic Conversion of Lactic Acid to Acetic Acid and 1,2-Propanediol by Lactobacillus buchneri
Oude Elferink, S. J. W. H., Krooneman, J., Gottschal, J. C., Spoelstra, S. F., Faber, F., & Driehuis, F. (2001) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.67.1.125-132.2001 · Cited by 685
Biorefineries for the production of top building block chemicals and their derivatives
Choi, S., Song, C. W., Shin, J. H., & Lee, S. Y. (2015) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2014.12.007 · Cited by 516
The commercial production of chemicals using pathway engineering
Chotani, G., Dodge, T., Hsu, A., Kumar, M., LaDuca, R., Trimbur, D., Weyler, W., & Sanford, K. (2000) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure and Molecular Enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0167-4838(00)00234-x · Cited by 234
Metadata
- Authors
- Cameron, D. C., Altaras, N. E., Hoffman, M. L., & Shaw, A. J.
- Venue
- Biotechnology Progress
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-02-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 116-125
- ISSN
- 1520-6033 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-7938
- OpenAlex
- W2028272509
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metabolic Engineering of Propanediol Pathways. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bp9701325
- The paper
- Cameron, D. C., Altaras, N. E., Hoffman, M. L., & Shaw, A. J. (1998). Metabolic Engineering of Propanediol Pathways. Biotechnology Progress. https://doi.org/10.1021/bp9701325
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.