The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microfabrication of Hepatocyte/Fibroblast Co-cultures: Role of Homotypic Cell Interactions
Abstract
Cell-cell interactions are important in embryogenesis, in adult physiology and pathophysiology of many disease processes. Co-cultivation of parenchymal and mesenchymal cells has been widely utilized as a paradigm for the study of cell-cell interactions in vitro. In addition, co-cultures of two cell types provide highly functional tissue constructs for use in therapeutic or investigational applications. The inherent complexity of such co-cultures creates difficulty in characterization of cell-cell interactions and their effects on function. In the present study, we utilize conventional "randomly distributed" co-cultures of primary rat hepatocytes and murine 3T3-J2 fibroblasts to investigate the role of increasing fibroblast density on hepatic function. In addition, we utilize microfabrication techniques to localize both cell populations in patterned configurations on rigid substrates. This technique allowed the isolation of fibroblast number as an independent variable in hepatic function. Notably, homotypic hepatocyte interactions were held constant by utilization of similar hepatocyte patterns in all conditions, and the heterotypic interface (region of contact between cell populations) was also held constant. Co-cultures were probed for synthetic and metabolic markers of liver-specific function. The data suggest that fibroblast number plays a role in modulation of hepatocellular response through homotypic fibroblast interactions. The response to changes in fibroblast number are distinct from those attributed to increased contact between hepatocytes and fibroblasts. This approach will allow further elucidation of the complex interplay between two cell types as they form a functional model tissue in vitro or as they interact in vivo to form a functional organ.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hepatocytes in collagen sandwich: evidence for transcriptional and translational regulation.
Dunn, J. C., Tompkins, R. G., & Yarmush, M. L. (1992) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.116.4.1043 · Cited by 295
Self-citation
Cited by
Hydrogels in Biology and Medicine: From Molecular Principles to Bionanotechnology
Peppas, N. A., Hilt, J. Z., Khademhosseini, A., & Langer, R. (2006) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200501612 · Cited by 4,109
Badylak, S. F., Taylor, D., & Uygun, K. (2011) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071910-124743 · Cited by 1,041
Bhatia, S. N., Balis, U. J., Yarmush, M. L., & Toner, M. (1999) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fasebj.13.14.1883 · Cited by 890
Self-citationMicropatterning as a tool to decipher cell morphogenesis and functions
Théry, M. (2010) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.075150 · Cited by 730
Cell Culture in 3-Dimensional Microfluidic Structure of PDMS (polydimethylsiloxane)
Leclerc, E., Sakai, Y., & Fujii, T. (2003) · Biomedical Microdevices · doi:10.1023/a:1024583026925 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhatia, S. N., Balis, U. J., Yarmush, M. L., & Toner, M.
- Venue
- Biotechnology Progress
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-06-05
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 378-387
- ISSN
- 1520-6033 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-7938
- OpenAlex
- W2070190764
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.