Cited by 293Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and ApplicationsCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesCovalent Organic Framework Applications

Functionalized MOFs for Enhanced CO2 Capture

Open access
Torrisi, Antonio, Bell, Robert G., Mellot-Draznieks, Caroline·2010·Crystal Growth & Design

Abstract

Based on computational studies, we propose new metal−organic framework materials, in which the bridging ligands have been functionalized by different substituents, with the aim of improving the CO 2 adsorption capacity of the material. The materials are based on the large-pore form of MIL-53(Al 3+ ), with the following functional groups: OH-, COOH-, NH 2 -, and CH 3 -. For each form, adsorption heats and isotherms were simulated using the Grand Canonical Monte Carlo method which were found to be consistent with DFT calculations. The study illustrates the enormous impact of the functional groups in enhancing CO 2 capture in the pressure range 0.01−0.5 bar and at room temperature. It also provides important insights into the structural factors which play a key role in the CO 2 adsorption process in the functionalized MOFs. We propose the material (OH) 2 -MIL-53(Al 3+ ) as an optimal candidate for improved CO 2 capture at low pressures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cg100646e

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adsorption capacity of biochar is affected by porosity, alkalinity, surface functional groups, mineral content, hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity.

    “Adsorption capacity of biochar is affected by many factors, such as porosity (Guo et al. 2022), alkalinity (Kumar etal. 2015), surface functional groups (Torrisi et al. 2010), mineral content (Li et al. 2017), hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity (Dissanayake etal. 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Torrisi, A., Bell, R. G., & Mellot-Draznieks, C.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Chemistry Department, University College London, 20 Gordon Street, London WC1H 0AJ, U.K.
Corresponding author
Bell, Robert G.
Venue
Crystal Growth & Design
Published
2010-06-10
Volume
10
Issue
7
Pages
2839-2841
ISSN
  • 1528-7483 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-7505
OpenAlex
W2077920739
Cited by
293
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 19
FWCI
15.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Crystal Growth & Design (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Covalent Organic Framework Applications
Keywords
metal-organic frameworks, CO2 capture, CO2 adsorption, MIL-53(Al), hydroxyl groups, carboxyl groups, amino groups, adsorption isotherms, heat of adsorption, low-pressure adsorption, grand canonical Monte Carlo simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review