The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of Automatic Three-Dimensional Model Builders Using 639 X-ray Structures
Abstract
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTComparison of Automatic Three-Dimensional Model Builders Using 639 X-ray StructuresJens Sadowski, Johann Gasteiger, and Gerhard KlebeCite this: J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 4, 1000–1008Publication Date (Print):July 1, 1994Publication History Published online1 May 2002Published inissue 1 July 1994https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ci00020a039https://doi.org/10.1021/ci00020a039research-articleACS PublicationsRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views644Altmetric-Citations534LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsSupporting Info (1)»Supporting Information Supporting Information Get e-Alerts
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
PRODRG: a tool for high-throughput crystallography of protein–ligand complexes
Schüttelkopf, A. W., & van Aalten, D. M. F. (2004) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444904011679 · Cited by 4,804
ACPYPE - AnteChamber PYthon Parser interfacE
Sousa da Silva, A. W., & Vranken, W. F. (2012) · BMC Research Notes · doi:10.1186/1756-0500-5-367 · Cited by 3,134
Oral Druggable Space beyond the Rule of 5: Insights from Drugs and Clinical Candidates
Doak, B. C., Over, B., Giordanetto, F., & Kihlberg, J. (2014) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.08.013 · Cited by 835
Machine learning unifies the modeling of materials and molecules
Bartók, A. P., De, S., Poelking, C., Bernstein, N., Kermode, J. R., Csányi, G., & Ceriotti, M. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1701816 · Cited by 764
Sushko, I., Novotarskyi, S., Körner, R., Pandey, A. K., Rupp, M., Teetz, W., Brandmaier, S., Abdelaziz, A., Prokopenko, V. V., Tanchuk, V. Y., et al. (2011) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-011-9440-2 · Cited by 686
Self-citationMachine learning methods in chemoinformatics
Mitchell, J. B. O. (2014) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1183 · Cited by 469
Rapid Context-Dependent Ligand Desolvation in Molecular Docking
Mysinger, M. M., & Shoichet, B. K. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci100214a · Cited by 317
Deriving the 3D structure of organic molecules from their infrared spectra
Hemmer, M. C., Steinhauer, V., & Gasteiger, J. (1999) · Vibrational Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/s0924-2031(99)00014-4 · Cited by 310
Self-citationSchneider, N., Lange, G., Hindle, S., Klein, R., & Rarey, M. (2013) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-012-9626-2 · Cited by 306
Confab - Systematic generation of diverse low-energy conformers
O'Boyle, N. M., Vandermeersch, T., Flynn, C. J., Maguire, A. R., & Hutchison, G. R. (2011) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/1758-2946-3-8 · Cited by 305
What Is High-Throughput Virtual Screening? A Perspective from Organic Materials Discovery
Pyzer-Knapp, E. O., Suh, C., Gómez-Bombarelli, R., Aguilera-Iparraguirre, J., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2015) · Annual Review of Materials Research · doi:10.1146/annurev-matsci-070214-020823 · Cited by 299
Subnanomolar Inhibitors from Computer Screening: A Model Study Using Human Carbonic Anhydrase II
Grüneberg, S., Wendt, B., & Klebe, G. (2001) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/1521-3773(20010119)40:2<389::aid-anie389>3.0.co;2-# · Cited by 76
Self-citationSynergies Between Quantum Mechanics and Machine Learning in Reaction Prediction
Sadowski, P., Fooshee, D., Subrahmanya, N., & Baldi, P. (2016) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00351 · Cited by 65
Automated Building of Organometallic Complexes from 3D Fragments
Foscato, M., Venkatraman, V., Occhipinti, G., Alsberg, B. K., & Jensen, V. R. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci5003153 · Cited by 35
ToxCast EPA in Vitro to in Vivo Challenge: Insight into the Rank-I Model
Novotarskyi, S., Abdelaziz, A., Sushko, Y., Körner, R., Vogt, J., & Tetko, I. V. (2016) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5b00481 · Cited by 34
Kaserer, T., Temml, V., Kutil, Z., Vanek, T., Landa, P., & Schuster, D. (2015) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.04.017 · Cited by 23
Ring Closure To Form Metal Chelates in 3D Fragment-Based de Novo Design
Foscato, M., Houghton, B. J., Occhipinti, G., Deeth, R. J., & Jensen, V. R. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00424 · Cited by 21
Cescon, E., Bolcato, G., Federico, S., Bissaro, M., Valentini, A., Ferlin, M. G., Spalluto, G., Sturlese, M., & Moro, S. (2020) · ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acsmedchemlett.0c00028 · Cited by 19
Modeling chemical reactions for drug design
Gasteiger, J. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-006-9097-4 · Cited by 19
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sadowski, J., Gasteiger, J., & Klebe, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1000-1008
- ISSN
- 0095-2338 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5142
- OpenAlex
- W1999118725
- Cited by
- 646
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
