Cited by 30Computational Drug Discovery MethodsPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismDrug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection

pragmatic approaches to using computational methods to predict xenobiotic metabolism

Open access
Piechota, Przemyslaw, Cronin, Mark T. D., Hewitt, Mark, Madden, Judith C.·2013·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Abstract

In this study the performance of a selection of computational models for the prediction of metabolites and/or sites of metabolism was investigated. These included models incorporated in the MetaPrint2D-React, Meteor, and SMARTCyp software. The algorithms were assessed using two data sets: one a homogeneous data set of 28 Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and paracetamol (DS1) and the second a diverse data set of 30 top-selling drugs (DS2). The prediction of metabolites for the diverse data set (DS2) was better than for the more homogeneous DS1 for each model, indicating that some areas of chemical space may be better represented than others in the data used to develop and train the models. The study also identified compounds for which none of the packages could predict metabolites, again indicating areas of chemical space where more information is needed. Pragmatic approaches to using metabolism prediction software have also been proposed based on the results described here. These approaches include using cutoff values instead of restrictive reasoning settings in Meteor to reduce the output with little loss of sensitivity and for directing metabolite prediction by preselection based on likely sites of metabolism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ci400050v

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some commercial software exists for the pharmaceutical area and covers many phase I and II reactions.

    “Some commercial software exists for the pharmaceutical area (192,193) and covers many phase I and II reactions.”

    From The food metabolome: a window over dietary exposure (2014) · cites this paper as [193]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Piechota, P., Cronin, M. T. D., Hewitt, M., & Madden, J. C.
Affiliations
Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Corresponding author
Madden, Judith C.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2013-06-11
Volume
53
Issue
6
Pages
1282-1293
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W2025744234
Cited by
30
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
Keywords
metabolite prediction, meteors, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, paracetamol, top-selling drugs, chemical space, cut-off values
MeSH terms
Acetaminophen, Algorithms, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Computer Simulation, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Models, Biological, Software, Analgesics, Non-Narcotic, Databases, Pharmaceutical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review