Cited by 48Pharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismComputational Drug Discovery MethodsMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

Evaluation of three state-of-the-art metabolite prediction software packages (Meteor, MetaSite, and StarDrop) through independent and synergistic use

T’jollyn, H., Boussery, K., Mortishire-Smith, R.J., Coe, K., De Boeck, B., Van Bocxlaer, J.F., Mannens, G.·2011·Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate three different metabolite prediction software packages (Meteor, MetaSite, and StarDrop) with respect to their ability to predict loci of metabolism and suggest relative proportions of metabolites. A chemically diverse test set of 22 compounds, for which in vivo human mass balance studies and metabolic schemes were available, was used as basis for the evaluation. Each software package was provided with structures of the parent compounds, and predicted metabolites were compared with experimentally determined human metabolites. The evaluation consisted of two parts. First, different settings within each software package were investigated and the software was evaluated using those settings determined to give the best prediction. Second, the three different packages were combined using the optimized settings to see whether a synergistic effect concerning the overall metabolism prediction could be established. The performance of the software was scored for both sensitivity and precision, taking into account the capabilities/limitations of the particular software. Varying results were obtained for the individual packages. Meteor showed a general tendency toward overprediction, and this led to a relatively low precision (∼35%) but high sensitivity (∼70%). MetaSite and StarDrop both exhibited a sensitivity and precision of ∼50%. By combining predictions obtained with the different packages, we found that increased precision can be obtained. We conclude that the state-of-the-art individual metabolite prediction software has many advantageous features but needs refinement to obtain acceptable prediction profiles. Synergistic use of different software packages could prove useful.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1124/dmd.111.039982

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some commercial software exists for the pharmaceutical area and covers many phase I and II reactions.

    “Some commercial software exists for the pharmaceutical area (192,193) and covers many phase I and II reactions.”

    From The food metabolome: a window over dietary exposure (2014) · cites this paper as [192]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
T’jollyn, H., Boussery, K., Mortishire-Smith, R. J., Coe, K., De Boeck, B., Van Bocxlaer, J. F., & Mannens, G.
Affiliations
Janssen (Belgium) (BE)
Corresponding author
Mannens, G.
Venue
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
39
Issue
11
Pages
2066-2075
ISSN
0090-9556 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161473802
Cited by
48
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Keywords
meteors, MetaSite, human metabolism, software comparison, sensitivity and precision, drug metabolism
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Drug Synergism, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Inactivation, Metabolic, Pharmacokinetics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Software, Structure-Activity Relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review