The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stigmata: An Algorithm To Determine Structural Commonalities in Diverse Datasets
Abstract
An algorithm, Stigmata, is described, which extracts structural commonalities from chemical datasets. It is discussed using several illustrative examples and a pharmaceutically interesting set of dopamine D2 agonists. The commonalities are determined using two-dimensional topological chemical descriptions and are incorporated into the key feature of the algorithm, the modal fingerprint. Flexibility is built into the algorithm by means of a user-defined threshold value, which affects the information content of the modal fingerprint. The use of the modal fingerprint as a diversity assessment tool, as a database similarity query, and as a basis for color mapping the determined commonalities back onto the chemical structures is demonstrated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Maggiora G. M., 1990, Introduction to Similarity in Chemistry
- Willett P., 1987, Similarity and Clustering in Chemical Information Systems
- Smith E. G., 1975, The Wiswesser Line-Formula Chemical Notation (WLN)
- Weininger D., 1988, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 28, 36, 10.1021/ci00057a005 · DOI · Paper page
- Humblet C., 1993, Ann. Repts. Med. Chem., 27, 284
- Willett P., 1991, Three-dimensional Chemical Structure Handling
- Barnard J. M., 1995, Fingerprint Descriptor Package, 3.1
- James C. A., 1995, Daylight Theory Manual
- Willett P., 1986, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 26, 118, 10.1021/ci00051a006 · doi:10.1021/ci00051a006
- Downs G. M., 1994, Advanced Computer-Assisted Techniques in Drug Discovery, 130
- Shemetulskis N. E., 1995, J. Comput-Aided Molecular Design, 9, 416, 10.1007/BF00123998 · doi:10.1007/bf00123998
- Wipke W. T., National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Anaheim, CA; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, April 2−6
- Siani M. A., 1995, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 35, 1033, 10.1021/ci00028a012 · DOI
- Siani M. A., 1994, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 34, 593, 10.1021/ci00019a017 · DOI
- Sheridan R. P., 1995, J. Chem. Inf. Comput Sci., 35, 320, 10.1021/ci00024a021 · doi:10.1021/ci00024a021
- Martin E. J., 1995, J. Med. Chem., 38, 1436
- Lauri G., 1994, J. Comput.-Aided Molecular Design, 8, 56, 10.1007/BF00124349 · DOI · Paper page
- Brown R. D., 1992, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 32, 531, 10.1021/ci00009a020 · doi:10.1021/ci00009a020
- Hagadone T. R, 1992, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 32, 521, 10.1021/ci00009a019 · DOI
- Varkony T. H., 1978, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 19, 111
- Takahashi Y, 1995, Top. Curr. Chem., 174, 33
- Bayada D. M., 1992, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 32, 685, 10.1021/ci00010a015 · doi:10.1021/ci00010a015
- Liston J., 1963, J. Bacteriol., 85, 1070, 10.1128/jb.85.5.1061-1070.1963 · doi:10.1128/jb.85.5.1061-1070.1963
- Maybridge, 1994, 1994 ed
- Seeman P., 1985, Molecular Pharmacology, 28, 399
- Brown R. D., 1995, National Meeting of the American Chemical Society
Cited by
MoleculeNet: a benchmark for molecular machine learning
Wu, Z., Ramsundar, B., Feinberg, E. N., Gomes, J., Geniesse, C., Pappu, A. S., Leswing, K., & Pande, V. (2018) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c7sc02664a · Cited by 3,107
A graph-convolutional neural network model for the prediction of chemical reactivity
Coley, C. W., Jin, W., Rogers, L., Jamison, T. F., Jaakkola, T. S., Green, W. H., Barzilay, R., & Jensen, K. F. (2019) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c8sc04228d · Cited by 679
Large-scale comparison of machine learning methods for drug target prediction on ChEMBL
Mayr, A., Klambauer, G., Unterthiner, T., Steijaert, M., Wegner, J. K., Ceulemans, H., Clevert, D.-A., & Hochreiter, S. (2018) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c8sc00148k · Cited by 584
Why do we need so many chemical similarity search methods?
Sheridan, R. (2002) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/s1359-6446(02)02411-x · Cited by 412
Constrained Bayesian optimization for automatic chemical design using variational autoencoders
Griffiths, R.-R., & Hernández-Lobato, J. M. (2020) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c9sc04026a · Cited by 339
Hert, J., Willett, P., Wilton, D. J., Acklin, P., Azzaoui, K., Jacoby, E., & Schuffenhauer, A. (2004) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci034231b · Cited by 310
Model agnostic generation of counterfactual explanations for molecules
Wellawatte, G. P., Seshadri, A., & White, A. D. (2022) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d1sc05259d · Cited by 143
Geppert, H., Horváth, T., Gärtner, T., Wrobel, S., & Bajorath, J. (2008) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci700461s · Cited by 63
From chemical metabolism to life: the origin of the genetic coding process
Danchin, A. (2017) · Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry · doi:10.3762/bjoc.13.111 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Shemetulskis, N. E., Weininger, D., Blankley, C. J., Yang, J. J., & Humblet, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 862-871
- ISSN
- 0095-2338 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085126686
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.