Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 159

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Stigmata: An Algorithm To Determine Structural Commonalities in Diverse Datasets

Shemetulskis, N. E., Weininger, D., Blankley, C. J., Yang, J. J., Humblet, C.·1996·Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Abstract

An algorithm, Stigmata, is described, which extracts structural commonalities from chemical datasets. It is discussed using several illustrative examples and a pharmaceutically interesting set of dopamine D2 agonists. The commonalities are determined using two-dimensional topological chemical descriptions and are incorporated into the key feature of the algorithm, the modal fingerprint. Flexibility is built into the algorithm by means of a user-defined threshold value, which affects the information content of the modal fingerprint. The use of the modal fingerprint as a diversity assessment tool, as a database similarity query, and as a basis for color mapping the determined commonalities back onto the chemical structures is demonstrated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ci950169+

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Maggiora G. M., 1990, Introduction to Similarity in Chemistry
  2. Willett P., 1987, Similarity and Clustering in Chemical Information Systems
  3. Smith E. G., 1975, The Wiswesser Line-Formula Chemical Notation (WLN)
  4. Weininger D., 1988, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 28, 36, 10.1021/ci00057a005 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Humblet C., 1993, Ann. Repts. Med. Chem., 27, 284
  6. Willett P., 1991, Three-dimensional Chemical Structure Handling
  7. Barnard J. M., 1995, Fingerprint Descriptor Package, 3.1
  8. James C. A., 1995, Daylight Theory Manual
  9. Willett P., 1986, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 26, 118, 10.1021/ci00051a006 · doi:10.1021/ci00051a006
  10. Downs G. M., 1994, Advanced Computer-Assisted Techniques in Drug Discovery, 130
  11. Shemetulskis N. E., 1995, J. Comput-Aided Molecular Design, 9, 416, 10.1007/BF00123998 · doi:10.1007/bf00123998
  12. Wipke W. T., National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Anaheim, CA; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, April 2−6
  13. Siani M. A., 1995, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 35, 1033, 10.1021/ci00028a012 · DOI
  14. Siani M. A., 1994, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 34, 593, 10.1021/ci00019a017 · DOI
  15. Sheridan R. P., 1995, J. Chem. Inf. Comput Sci., 35, 320, 10.1021/ci00024a021 · doi:10.1021/ci00024a021
  16. Martin E. J., 1995, J. Med. Chem., 38, 1436
  17. Lauri G., 1994, J. Comput.-Aided Molecular Design, 8, 56, 10.1007/BF00124349 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Brown R. D., 1992, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 32, 531, 10.1021/ci00009a020 · doi:10.1021/ci00009a020
  19. Hagadone T. R, 1992, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 32, 521, 10.1021/ci00009a019 · DOI
  20. Varkony T. H., 1978, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 19, 111
  21. Takahashi Y, 1995, Top. Curr. Chem., 174, 33
  22. Bayada D. M., 1992, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 32, 685, 10.1021/ci00010a015 · doi:10.1021/ci00010a015
  23. Liston J., 1963, J. Bacteriol., 85, 1070, 10.1128/jb.85.5.1061-1070.1963 · doi:10.1128/jb.85.5.1061-1070.1963
  24. Maybridge, 1994, 1994 ed
  25. Seeman P., 1985, Molecular Pharmacology, 28, 399
  26. Brown R. D., 1995, National Meeting of the American Chemical Society

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Shemetulskis, N. E., Weininger, D., Blankley, C. J., Yang, J. J., & Humblet, C.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences
Published
1996-01-01
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
862-871
ISSN
0095-2338 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085126686
Cited by
159
References
0
FWCI
8.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.