The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adsorption Behavior of Arsenate at Transition Metal Cations Captured by Amino-Functionalized Mesoporous Silicas
Abstract
We show that Fe 3+, Co 2+, Ni 2+, and Cu 2+ fixed by diamino-functionalized MCM-41 and MCM-48 work as adsorption centers for arsenate ions. The stoichiometry of the N/metal cation was determined as well as the As/metal cation for the adsorption of arsenate. The effectiveness of the removal of arsenate from a dilute solution is ordered according to Fe 3+ > H + ∼ Co 2+ > Ni 2+ ∼ Cu 2+, which is slightly different from the adsorption capacity: Fe 3+ > Co 2+ ∼ H + > Ni 2+ > Cu 2+ . The distribution coefficients, K d, exceed 200 000 at [arsenate] < 100 ppm in Fe/NN-MCM-41. The Fe center binds nearly three arsenate ions, which allows the adsorption capacity of Fe/NN-MCM-48 to be one of the largest at 2.5 mmol (g of adsorbent) - 1 among the adsorbents of arsenate. The difference between the meso-framework structures appears in their adsorption capacity; cation/NN-MCM-48 adsorbs a larger amount of arsenate than cation/NN-MCM-41. This is mainly caused by the difference of cation content in these functionalized mesoporous silicas. A sudden decrease in K d for Fe/NN-MCM-41 at a coverage around θ = 0.3 suggests a difference in the stabilization constant between the first and the second arsenates while K d (θ) in Ni and Cu/NN-MCM-41 decreased gradually. The equilibrium constants, b (= k a / k d ), were plotted against the coverage (Langmuir plots), where Fe 3+ showed a minimum at θ = 0.65 while b in the Ni 2+ and Cu 2+ sites was almost constant. The inhibition by coexisting anions such as SO 4 2 - and Cl - was evaluated by the suppression of the adsorption capacity. Differences between the suppression among the cations were found. We analyzed the local structure of the adsorption centers in Fe and Co captured in NN-MCM-41 by EXAFS spectroscopy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Arsenate and Chromate Retention Mechanisms on Goethite. 1. Surface Structure
Fendorf, S., Eick, M. J., Grossl, P., & Sparks, D. L. (1997) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es950653t · Cited by 1,017
Cited by
Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—A critical review
Mohan, D., & Pittman, C. U. (2007) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.006 · Cited by 3,536
Samiey, B., Cheng, C.-H., & Wu, J. (2014) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma7020673 · Cited by 368
Sayari, A., Hamoudi, S., & Yang, Y. (2005) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm048393e · Cited by 340
Saiz, J., Bringas, E., & Ortiz, I. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1002/jctb.4331 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Yoshitake, H., Yokoi, T., & Tatsumi, T.
- Venue
- Chemistry of Materials
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-03-28
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1713-1721
- ISSN
- 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5002
- OpenAlex
- W1985177061
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adsorption Behavior of Arsenate at Transition Metal Cations Captured by Amino-Functionalized Mesoporous Silicas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/cm0218007
- The paper
- Yoshitake, H., Yokoi, T., & Tatsumi, T. (2003). Adsorption Behavior of Arsenate at Transition Metal Cations Captured by Amino-Functionalized Mesoporous Silicas. Chemistry of Materials. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm0218007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.