The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lithium Lanthanum Titanates: A Review
Abstract
To date, the highest bulk lithium ion-conducting solid electrolyte is the perovskite (ABO 3 )-type lithium lanthanum titanate (LLT) Li 3 x La (2/3)- x □ (1/3) - 2 x TiO 3 (0 < x < 0.16) and its related structure materials. The x ≈ 0.1 member exhibits conductivity of 1 × 10 -3 S/cm at room temperature with an activation energy of 0.40 eV. The conductivity is comparable to that of commonly used polymer/liquid electrolytes. The ionic conductivity of LLT mainly depends on the size of the A-site ion cation (e.g., La or rare earth, alkali or alkaline earth), lithium and vacancy concentration, and the nature of the B−O bond. For example, replacement of La by other rare earth elements with smaller ionic radii than that of La decreases the lithium ion conductivity, while partial substitution of La by Sr (larger ionic radii than that of La) slightly increases the lithium ion conductivity. The high lithium ion conductivity of LLT is considered to be due to the large concentration of A-site vacancies, and the motion of lithium by a vacancy mechanism through the wide square planar bottleneck between the A sites. It is considered that BO 6 /TiO 6 octahedra tilting facilitate the lithium ion mobility in the perovskite structure. The actual mechanism of lithium ion conduction is not yet clearly understood. In this paper, we review the structural properties, electrical conductivity, and electrochemical characterization of LLT and its related materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shannon, R. D. (1976) · Acta Crystallographica Section A · doi:10.1107/s0567739476001551 · Cited by 66,145
Cited by
Designing solid-state electrolytes for safe, energy-dense batteries
Zhao, Q., Stalin, S., Zhao, C.-Z., & Archer, L. A. (2020) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0165-5 · Cited by 2,372
Garnet-type solid-state fast Li ion conductors for Li batteries: critical review
Thangadurai, V., Narayanan, S., & Pinzaru, D. (2014) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00020j · Cited by 1,534
Self-citationSodium Metal Anodes: Emerging Solutions to Dendrite Growth
Lee, B., Paek, E., Mitlin, D., & Lee, S. W. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00642 · Cited by 940
Ong, S. P., Mo, Y., Richards, W. D., Miara, L., Lee, H. S., & Ceder, G. (2013) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c2ee23355j · Cited by 710
Recent advances in solid polymer electrolytes for lithium batteries
Zhang, Q., Liu, K., Ding, F., & Liu, X. (2017) · Nano Research · doi:10.1007/s12274-017-1763-4 · Cited by 544
Zhao, Y., Ding, Y., Li, Y., Peng, L., Byon, H. R., Goodenough, J. B., & Yu, G. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00289c · Cited by 458
Compatibility issues between electrodes and electrolytes in solid-state batteries
Tian, Y., Shi, T., Richards, W. D., Li, J., Kim, J. C., Bo, S.-H., & Ceder, G. (2017) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c7ee00534b · Cited by 396
Recent progress on solid-state hybrid electrolytes for solid-state lithium batteries
Liang, J., Luo, J., Sun, Q., Yang, X., Li, R., & Sun, X. (2019) · Energy Storage Materials · doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2019.06.021 · Cited by 365
Recent progress in solid oxide and lithium ion conducting electrolytes research
Thangadurai, V., & Weppner, W. (2006) · Ionics · doi:10.1007/s11581-006-0013-7 · Cited by 353
Self-citationKwak, H., Wang, S., Park, J., Liu, Y., Kim, K. T., Choi, Y., Mo, Y., & Jung, Y. S. (2022) · ACS Energy Letters · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.2c00438 · Cited by 341
Lithium superionic conductors with corner-sharing frameworks
Jun, K., Sun, Y., Xiao, Y., Zeng, Y., Kim, R., Kim, H., Miara, L. J., Im, D., Wang, Y., & Ceder, G. (2022) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-022-01222-4 · Cited by 236
Metadata
- Authors
- Stramare, S., Thangadurai, V., & Weppner, W.
- Venue
- Chemistry of Materials
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-09-23
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 3974-3990
- ISSN
- 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5002
- OpenAlex
- W2007641411
- Cited by
- 898
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.