The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ε-Fe2O3: An Advanced Nanomaterial Exhibiting Giant Coercive Field, Millimeter-Wave Ferromagnetic Resonance, and Magnetoelectric Coupling
Open accessAbstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Nanosized iron oxides still attract significant attention within the scientific community, because of their application-promising properties. Among them, ε-Fe 2 O 3 constitutes a remarkable phase, taking pride in a giant coercive field at room temperature, significant ferromagnetic resonance, and coupled magnetoelectric features that are not observed in any other simple metal oxide phase. In this work, we review basic structural and magnetic characteristics of this extraordinary nanomaterial with an emphasis on questionable and unresolved issues raised during its intense research in the past years. We show how a combination of various experimental techniques brings essential and valuable information, with regard to understanding the physicochemical properties of the ε-polymorph of Fe 2 O 3, which remained unexplored for a long period of time. In addition, we recapitulate a series of synthetic routes that lead to the formation of ε-Fe 2 O 3, highlighting their advantages and drawbacks. We also demonstrate how magnetic properties of ε-Fe 2 O 3 can be tuned through the exploitation of various morphologies of ε-Fe 2 O 3 nanosystems, the alignment of ε-Fe 2 O 3 nanoobjects in a supporting matrix, and various degrees of cation substitution. Based on the current knowledge of the scientific community working in the field of ε-Fe 2 O 3, we finally arrive at two main future challenges: (i) the search for optimal synthetic conditions to prepare single-phase ε-Fe 2 O 3 with a high yield, desired size, morphology, and stability; and (ii) the search for a correct description of the magnetic behavior of ε-Fe 2 O 3 at temperatures below the characteristic magnetic ordering temperature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism
Moriya, T. (1960) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.120.91 · Cited by 7,234
Laurent, S., Forge, D., Port, M., Roch, A., Robic, C., Vander Elst, L., & Muller, R. N. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068445e · Cited by 6,852
Monodisperse FePt Nanoparticles and Ferromagnetic FePt Nanocrystal Superlattices
Sun, S., Murray, C. B., Weller, D., Folks, L., & Moser, A. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5460.1989 · Cited by 6,137
Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis and surface functionalization strategies
Wu, W., He, Q., & Jiang, C. (2008) · Nanoscale Research Letters · doi:10.1007/s11671-008-9174-9 · Cited by 2,300
Cited by
Polymorphous Transformations of Nanometric Iron(III) Oxide: A Review
Machala, L., Tuček, J., & Zbořil, R. (2011) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm200397g · Cited by 573
Self-citationWu, W., Jiang, C. Z., & Roy, V. A. L. (2016) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c6nr07542h · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Tuček, J., Zbořil, R., Namai, A., & Ohkoshi, S.-I.
- Venue
- Chemistry of Materials
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-10-27
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 6483-6505
- ISSN
- 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5002
- OpenAlex
- W1997110233
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.