Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 414

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Size-Tunable, Ultrasmall NaGdF4 Nanoparticles: Insights into Their T1 MRI Contrast Enhancement

Johnson, Noah J. J., Oakden, Wendy, Stanisz, Greg J., Scott Prosser, R., van Veggel, Frank C. J. M.·2011·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

We report on the size-tunable synthesis of thermodynamically stable (β) NaGdF 4 nanoparticles (NPs) below 10 nm. Paramagnetic β-NaGdF 4 NPs of four different sizes (2.5–8.0 nm with a narrow size distribution) were synthesized by simple modifications of the reaction conditions affecting nanoparticle growth dynamics. The synthesized NPs were transferred to water by exchanging the oleate ligands with biocompatible polyvinylpyrrolidone, and analyzed for their ability to affect magnetic resonance (MR) T 1 longitudinal relaxivity at 1.5 T. The ionic relaxivity (unit Gd 3+ concentration) values increased from 3.0 mM –1 s –1 to 7.2 mM –1 s –1 with decreasing particle size, and the relaxivity of the 2.5-nm particle is almost twice that of clinically used Gd-DTPA (Magnevist) relaxivity. The relaxivity per contrast agent (i.e., per nanoparticle) for these NPs is 200–3000 times larger than the clinical agent, showing great potential as local contrast enhancement probes. The rate of increase in ionic relaxivity with decreasing NP size was similar to the rate of increase in the NP surface-to-volume (S/V) ratio, giving direct indication that the surface Gd ions are the major contributors to the relaxivity enhancement. Further analysis based on concentration of NPs, mass concentration of NP, and unit surface area, has revealed that the surface Gd ions on a larger NP affect the relaxivity more strongly than those on a smaller NP. This is discussed based on the increase in NP rotational correlation time (τ R ) with increasing size. A particular advantage of β-NaGdF 4 NPs over other Gd 3+ -based inorganic NPs is that they are good hosts for upconverting emission. We demonstrate this by extending the synthesis protocol outlined here to prepare luminescent ultrasmall β- NaGdF 4:Yb 3+ /Tm 3+ NPs as potential bimodal probes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cm201297x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 414

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, N. J. J., Oakden, W., Stanisz, G. J., Scott Prosser, R., & van Veggel, F. C. J. M.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2011-07-22
Volume
23
Issue
16
Pages
3714-3722
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2299254898
Cited by
414
References
4
FWCI
20.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.