Cited by 227Aerogels and thermal insulationMesoporous Materials and CatalysisSupercapacitor Materials and Fabrication

Carbon Aerogels and Monoliths: Control of Porosity and Nanoarchitecture via Sol–Gel routes

Antonietti, Markus, Fechler, Nina, Fellinger, Tim-Patrick·2014·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

The synthesis of carbon aerogels by sol–gel like processes, i.e., hard templating, phase demixing, hydrothermal carbonization techniques, as well as by ionothermal syntheses are reviewed. In all these techniques, we start with a liquid reaction solution, where—controlled by experimental parameters and structure-directing additives—a porous carbon material with high conductivity, high pore volume, and high specific surface area is obtained. Many of these synthesis approaches give the resulting material in simple, rather sustainable processes, and the structures can be employed directly after isolation without further activation processes. The article will discuss also some applications, such as battery and electrode materials as well as catalyst supports.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cm402239e

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Carbon aerogel (CA) with a 3D interconnected network and unique properties, including highly porous structure, large surface area, and great electron transport performance, is an ideal substrate for MoS2 loading and can be used in the energy area.

    “Among various carbon materials, carbon aerogel (CA) with 3D interconnected network and unique properties, including highly porous structure, large surface area, and great electron transport performance, is an ideal substrate for MoS2 loading and can be used in energy area.44−46”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Antonietti, M., Fechler, N., & Fellinger, T.-P.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces (DE)
Corresponding author
Antonietti, Markus
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2013-10-02
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
196-210
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2054117848
Cited by
227
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemistry of Materials (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Aerogels and thermal insulation
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
Keywords
carbon aerogels, carbon monoliths, porosity control, nanoarchitectures, sol-gel synthesis, hard templating, hydrothermal carbonization, ionothermal synthesis, specific surface area, electrical conductivity, battery electrode materials, catalyst supports

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review