The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reactions on Mineral Dust
Abstract
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTReactions on Mineral DustCourtney R. Usher, Amy E. Michel, and Vicki H. GrassianView Author Information Department of Chemistry, Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, and Center for Global and Regional Environmental Research, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242 Cite this: Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 12, 4883–4940Publication Date (Web):November 12, 2003Publication History Received7 May 2003Published online12 November 2003Published inissue 1 December 2003https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr020657yhttps://doi.org/10.1021/cr020657yresearch-articleACS PublicationsCopyright © 2003 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views5786Altmetric-Citations738LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Aerosols,Anions,Environmental modeling,Minerals,Oxides Get e-Alerts
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimates of the direct and indirect radiative forcing due to tropospheric aerosols: A review
Haywood, J., & Boucher, O. (2000) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/1999rg000078 · Cited by 2,097
Holzinger, R., Warneke, C., Hansel, A., Jordan, A., Lindinger, W., Scharffe, D. H., Schade, G., & Crutzen, P. J. (1999) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/1999gl900156 · Cited by 343
Cited by
Aerosol Mixing State: Measurements, Modeling, and Impacts
Riemer, N., Ault, A. P., West, M., Craig, R. L., & Curtis, J. H. (2019) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2018rg000615 · Cited by 459
Bellouin, N., Rae, J., Jones, A., Johnson, C., Haywood, J., & Boucher, O. (2011) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/2011jd016074 · Cited by 448
An overview of current issues in the uptake of atmospheric trace gases by aerosols and clouds
Kolb, C. E., Cox, R. A., Abbatt, J. P. D., Ammann, M., Davis, E. J., Donaldson, D. J., Garrett, B. C., George, C., Griffiths, P. T., Hanson, D. R., et al. (2010) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-10-10561-2010 · Cited by 405
Alexander, B., Park, R. J., Jacob, D. J., & Gong, S. (2009) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2008jd010486 · Cited by 312
Stratospheric solar geoengineering without ozone loss
Keith, D. W., Weisenstein, D. K., Dykema, J. A., & Keutsch, F. N. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1615572113 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- Usher, C. R., Michel, A. E., & Grassian, V. H.
- Venue
- Chemical Reviews
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-11-12
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4883-4940
- ISSN
- 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6890
- OpenAlex
- W2045465826
- Cited by
- 949
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reactions on Mineral Dust. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/cr020657y
- The paper
- Usher, C. R., Michel, A. E., & Grassian, V. H. (2003). Reactions on Mineral Dust. Chemical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020657y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
