Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Carbon Modifications and Surfaces for Catalytic Organic Transformations

Schaetz, Alexander, Zeltner, Martin, Stark, Wendelin J.·2012·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

Carbon is anything but a new material, yet ubiquitously applicable for many catalytic transformations in modern organic chemistry. It is highly versatile, as it occurs as modifications abundantly available as 1–3D carbonaceous materials due to technical progress. In addition, materials such as activated charcoal, ordered mesoporous carbon (OMC), graphite and graphene (oxide), carbon nanotubes (CNTs), nanospheres (nano-onions, fullerenes), and many others are no “innocent” supports, as demonstrated by many recent publications within the revitalized field of “carbocatalysis”. By nature, carbon scaffolds offer a perfect link between nanoscaled matter and organic molecules, which makes them an ideal cornerstone for molecular catalysts. Apart from this inherent chemical significance, the physical properties (e.g., different conductivity) are equally important for the performance of heterogeneous or immobilized homogeneous catalysts. Careful selection of the carbon scaffold enables control of reactivity by tuning the electronic interactions of active sites with the support or among each other. Moreover, separation and recycling of “heterogenized” catalysts can be further improved by rendering carbon “magnetic”, that is, by incorporation of magnetic particles or by coating metal nanomagnets with graphene-like shells. Altogether, tuning the properties of carbon supports might lead to catalysts tailored not only in matters of reactivity (electron shuttle), but also to down-to-earth problems such as purification (magnetic separation and recycling). This critical review will highlight how far such concepts have already been implemented in the design of “heterogenized” catalysts and is meant to widen the perspectives where certain concepts have yet to be realized.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cs300014k

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Schaetz, A., Zeltner, M., & Stark, W. J.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2012-05-22
Volume
2
Issue
6
Pages
1267-1284
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2318809197
Cited by
188
References
4
FWCI
7.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.